Michael "Dorkman" Scott
04-02-2007, 02:46 AM
I've got a question. People are always worrying about timecode and reels and sync and stuff like that.
How difficult would it be (theoretically, I know it's too late to implement in RED ONE) to place an atomic clock in a camera and use that as timecode?
If every camera had the atomic clock in it, running at all times, then all cameras would always be in sync. You could do multicam deals with no problem. Need to know the date you shot something? It's part of the timecode.
I guess the problem comes in frame rates, but even then, just implement it so that it can segment each second into "Frames" on the fly, and otherwise leave the rest of the timecode the same.
Admittedly I don't know much about how atomic clocks work, and perhaps a date-time stamp for timecode is a bad idea for some reason, but that's why I'm asking the question!
How difficult would it be (theoretically, I know it's too late to implement in RED ONE) to place an atomic clock in a camera and use that as timecode?
If every camera had the atomic clock in it, running at all times, then all cameras would always be in sync. You could do multicam deals with no problem. Need to know the date you shot something? It's part of the timecode.
I guess the problem comes in frame rates, but even then, just implement it so that it can segment each second into "Frames" on the fly, and otherwise leave the rest of the timecode the same.
Admittedly I don't know much about how atomic clocks work, and perhaps a date-time stamp for timecode is a bad idea for some reason, but that's why I'm asking the question!