Russ Lasson
12-17-2008, 10:06 PM
This article that I found referenced in a thread here on RED User says that brighter exposure levels have more numerical values in a 12-bit linear RAW file.
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/tutorials/expose-right.shtml
If the first f-stop has 2048 values, but the fifth f-stop only has 128, that sounds more exponential or logarithmic than linear.
If it was linear, wouldn't each f-stop have the same number of values to capture the data? Isn't the noise generated from lower light levels hitting the sensor thus creating a lower signal to noise ratio?
I don't really want to start an advanced math thread here. So my real question is, with the RED One, does it really have more values for highlights than shadows like this article suggests with RAW cameras?
Thanks,
-Russ
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/tutorials/expose-right.shtml
If the first f-stop has 2048 values, but the fifth f-stop only has 128, that sounds more exponential or logarithmic than linear.
If it was linear, wouldn't each f-stop have the same number of values to capture the data? Isn't the noise generated from lower light levels hitting the sensor thus creating a lower signal to noise ratio?
I don't really want to start an advanced math thread here. So my real question is, with the RED One, does it really have more values for highlights than shadows like this article suggests with RAW cameras?
Thanks,
-Russ