PDA

View Full Version : Scarlet Footage?



PatrickKrebs
04-14-2009, 12:05 PM
Has anyone ever posted footage from the Scarlett yet? Can you post links tot he threads, I've been hunting through the forums for a day, but someone might know when to find it better than me.

Leaf Baimbridge
04-14-2009, 12:07 PM
Motion version- http://redgrabs.com/izzy/

Radim Schreiber
04-14-2009, 12:12 PM
Wow, that is great shot.

killfilm
04-15-2009, 03:54 PM
I wouldnt mind checking out a RAW motion version of that without any compression, throw it into premiere and play with it. Dont get me wrong, looks awesome. The RAW version will show the full glory

Alex Sutherland
04-15-2009, 10:24 PM
Does anyone feel that shot is a touch noisy? Noise is my biggest beef with my current rig.

Scott Watts
04-15-2009, 10:35 PM
Does anyone feel that shot is a touch noisy? Noise is my biggest beef with my current rig.

Nope.

Alex Sutherland
04-15-2009, 10:45 PM
Nope.

The darkest parts are clean, but you see some noise on the critter's temples. It's a far sight better than my EX1, though. Is there any word from which make of the Scarlet this shot came? 2/3?

jbeale
04-15-2009, 10:48 PM
is there any reliable way to tell the difference between noise, and fine detail which is mangled by the compression for web display?

Leaf Baimbridge
04-15-2009, 11:25 PM
The darkest parts are clean, but you see some noise on the critter's temples. It's a far sight better than my EX1, though. Is there any word from which make of the Scarlet this shot came? 2/3?

There's always a noise nazi no matter what. Every movie I've ever seen in my entire life has had noise in it somewhere, in some shot. I've never walked out of a theatre thinking to myself "It would have been a good movie if it hadn't been for the noise in that one sequence", or, "Wow that movie sucked, but at least I didn't see any noise in any of the shots". And of course if you're sitting a foot away from the screen, you're going to see noise.

This is a test shot with the 2/3 chip using a 35mm lens.

Justin O'Neill
04-16-2009, 12:07 AM
The darkest parts are clean, but you see some noise on the critter's temples. It's a far sight better than my EX1, though. Is there any word from which make of the Scarlet this shot came? 2/3?

Shot on the 2/3″ Scarlet with 100mm PL mount RED PRO PRIME. Shot at T5.6 with the lizard about 4-5 inches from the lens. (from Jarred).

Alex Sutherland
04-16-2009, 12:10 AM
There's always a noise nazi no matter what. Every movie I've ever seen in my entire life has had noise in it somewhere, in some shot. I've never walked out of a theatre thinking to myself "It would have been a good movie if it hadn't been for the noise in that one sequence", or, "Wow that movie sucked, but at least I didn't see any noise in any of the shots". And of course if you're sitting a foot away from the screen, you're going to see noise.

This is a test shot with the 2/3 chip using a 35mm lens.

Please excuse me for daring criticize the quality of anything.

Jonathon Laing
04-16-2009, 12:48 AM
Please excuse me for daring criticize the quality of anything.

Your excused. :sifone:



Jono

Gualbert
04-16-2009, 12:07 PM
Jarred said the clip was HEAVILY compressed so why even try to judge a compressed clip for noise?

http://www.reduser.net/forum/showthread.php?t=27537

Chuck Z
04-16-2009, 12:54 PM
You're seeing compression artifacts more than noise.

Alex Sutherland
04-16-2009, 02:25 PM
That's good news.

David Rasberry
04-16-2009, 03:25 PM
Ha, ha, my bad eyes are noisier than that clip!

PatrickKrebs
04-17-2009, 01:56 PM
Wow absolutely amazing - I wouldn't mind getting a still frame totally uncompressed - i feel like if you scaled anything 3K down to that size it would look amazing.

Scott Watts
04-18-2009, 12:22 PM
Yes, the footage makes me very excited about the Scarlet. I was considering not buying one, but that footage convinced me.

Wayne Morellini
04-18-2009, 07:33 PM
There's always a noise nazi no matter what. Every movie I've ever seen in my entire life has had noise in it somewhere, in some shot. I've never walked out of a theatre thinking to myself "It would have been a good movie if it hadn't been for the noise in that one sequence", or, "Wow that movie sucked, but at least I didn't see any noise in any of the shots".

Saw a movie on blu-ray recently, and even though the movie was not my cup of tea, I thought it would have been a lot better without the monumental heavy virtually unwatchable noise inside and outside on everything. I saw a Red shot movie in a cinema before that, and it sucked to me, but I thought at least it did not have any noise.

Now you have two anti-noise zealots hear ;) .

Content maybe king, but content done well looks better.

yoni bentovim
04-20-2009, 01:52 PM
it does look fab , but really everything looks great with a 100mm lens ... (you can stick it on a mobile phone and it will look great...) it would be great to see some simple daylight street /wide angel footage...
anyway hoping to get more info soon ...
Bests
Yoni