J. Bernard Vallon
01-19-2007, 09:44 AM
I know this is a funky question, and I'm thinking the answer would be no, but...
I love all the advantages of keeping a digital negative in REDCode, but for most projects, I'm SURE I wouldn't need anything higher than 2k as an output.
REDCode has such a small data rate, plus it preserves the 12bit depth. Can I shoot in 4k REDcode, then with REDCine downsample to 2k REDCode, and keep that as my digital neg?
That would let me shoot a large project with 5 TB rather than 20 TB, plus keep the 12 bit information, and shoot with the 4k footprint. I think the answer is going to be no because that might involve REbayering the RAW information. But i figure if it never gets DEbayered, i have a chance.
I love all the advantages of keeping a digital negative in REDCode, but for most projects, I'm SURE I wouldn't need anything higher than 2k as an output.
REDCode has such a small data rate, plus it preserves the 12bit depth. Can I shoot in 4k REDcode, then with REDCine downsample to 2k REDCode, and keep that as my digital neg?
That would let me shoot a large project with 5 TB rather than 20 TB, plus keep the 12 bit information, and shoot with the 4k footprint. I think the answer is going to be no because that might involve REbayering the RAW information. But i figure if it never gets DEbayered, i have a chance.