Jack Kelly
10-20-2009, 02:48 AM
This is old news but these Stanford academics are doing some remarkably interesting stuff with light field cameras:
http://graphics.stanford.edu/papers/lfcamera/
Photographs digitally refocused at different depths, computed after a single exposure of our light field camera. The fourth image shows what a conventional camera would have produced.
http://graphics.stanford.edu/papers/lfcamera/images/group/jacquie2.jpg
http://graphics.stanford.edu/papers/lfcamera/images/group/marshall2.jpg
http://graphics.stanford.edu/papers/lfcamera/images/group/polly2.jpg
http://graphics.stanford.edu/papers/lfcamera/images/group/weaver2.jpg
http://graphics.stanford.edu/papers/lfcamera/images/group/mark2.jpg
Imagine if the focus distance was just another bit of non-destructive metadata recorded by the camera. In post, sharpening an out-of-focus image would be as simple as shifting the focus distance metadata.
http://graphics.stanford.edu/papers/lfcamera/
Photographs digitally refocused at different depths, computed after a single exposure of our light field camera. The fourth image shows what a conventional camera would have produced.
http://graphics.stanford.edu/papers/lfcamera/images/group/jacquie2.jpg
http://graphics.stanford.edu/papers/lfcamera/images/group/marshall2.jpg
http://graphics.stanford.edu/papers/lfcamera/images/group/polly2.jpg
http://graphics.stanford.edu/papers/lfcamera/images/group/weaver2.jpg
http://graphics.stanford.edu/papers/lfcamera/images/group/mark2.jpg
Imagine if the focus distance was just another bit of non-destructive metadata recorded by the camera. In post, sharpening an out-of-focus image would be as simple as shifting the focus distance metadata.