PDA

View Full Version : B4 Mount



Jarred Land
01-24-2007, 07:44 PM
We put the B4 mount on the Red One Lens mount today and shot some quick tests... we Used a Fuiji HD B4 zoom and Im glad to announce we have a very, very healthy optical margin around the 2k windowed frame...

all you who plan on using your B4 lenses.. today was a good day for you.

Tonaci Tran
01-24-2007, 07:51 PM
great news. thanks jared. out of curiosity..was the RS232 connector enabled for use of the zoom servo for the lens?

Blair S. Paulsen
01-24-2007, 07:56 PM
I have begun dancing and it is making typing rather difficult :D

Teague Kennedy
01-24-2007, 08:00 PM
how much with the "healthy margin" alter field of view of pic? (percieved focal length)

Ralph Oshiro
01-24-2007, 08:03 PM
Woo hoo! Wow! This just gets better and better! First the Nikon F-mount! Now a B4 mount! This IS going to be the most versatile image-making machine on the planet!

Andrew Benz
01-24-2007, 08:12 PM
We put the B4 mount on the Red One Lens mount today and shot some quick tests... we Used a Fuiji HD B4 zoom and Im glad to announce we have a very, very healthy optical margin around the 2k windowed frame...

all you who plan on using your B4 lenses.. today was a good day for you.

That is great news (2k windowed frame... ). As a matter of fact, I am currently looking at a few Fuji HD zoom lenses. Jarred, what model were you guys using and can you elaborate further on your impressions? First, I have things together to purchase the RED lenses and now this? Great news all around.

Cheers

Jarred Land
01-24-2007, 08:13 PM
great news. thanks jarred. out of curiosity..was the RS232 connector enabled for use of the zoom servo for the lens?

no lens controls.. just manual.

REDHKSC
01-24-2007, 08:21 PM
Will RED one equip the 12 pin lens connector for those HD TV lenses ?
Will the EVF display last secs recording of picture while pressing the RET switch on those HDTV lenses ?

Stewart

donatello b
01-24-2007, 09:18 PM
for the B4 test - did you use some kind of adaptor or glass behind the HD B4 lens ( for it to focus light(rgb) on same image plane ) ? or does the RED B4 lens mount have some kind of glass behind it ?

Don Woods
01-24-2007, 09:28 PM
Very cool. Another wepon in the RED arsenal.

Jarred Land
01-24-2007, 09:31 PM
here is one of the frames.. you can see the roll off from the adapter. Its still amazing to me how large the Mysterium sensor actually is.. I still do a double take when i drop 1080 or 2k frames inside the massive 4k active area.

http://www.reduser.net/forum/uploaded/1_1169703062.jpg

Don Woods
01-24-2007, 09:34 PM
Wow that is very nice... and I think a more then usable frame.

Emanuel A.
01-24-2007, 09:38 PM
the massive 4k active area.

http://www.reduser.net/forum/uploaded/1_1169703062.jpgThat's why my bet will be the 4K recording from a 35mm (motion or still glass) basis, anyways.

Andrew Benz
01-24-2007, 09:38 PM
Thanks for the reference Jarred.

Andrew Benz
01-24-2007, 09:41 PM
That's why my bet will be the 4K recording from a 35mm (motion or still glass) basis, anyways.
But Emanuel, what about the football @120fps?

S. Um
01-24-2007, 09:49 PM
Thanks Jarred. Since that optical margin is so "healthy" around the 2k frame, is the a multiplication factor for the lens' focal length?

Brian Ferguson
01-24-2007, 09:59 PM
Ok that does it I am going back to the gym...
Widescreen test chart dummy that I am.
Hey Jarred is this the full frame Mysterium?
Meaning it is more like 5k ?

Emanuel A.
01-24-2007, 10:19 PM
But Emanuel, what about the football @120fps?Good one, Andrew! I believe these RED pioneers where some of us are included...are rocking as well. With the lesson well studied.

1080p RGB even if not @120fps but up to 60fps will go rock too. 400% from 2K to 4K is a lot. Especially if and when our target may have the big screen or the future proof as its core mission. On the other hand, we'll have the benefits of downsampling [LINK (http://www.dvxuser.com/V6/showthread.php?t=81853)].

:)

Andrew Benz
01-24-2007, 10:26 PM
E., I read somewhere were Rob said we could go 2K (windowed?) 120fps using the RAW port to RED RAID. If I am wrong please correct me. This would be great for sports, etc.

Emanuel A.
01-24-2007, 10:32 PM
Yup but taking this:
http://red.com/formatoptions.htm

EDIT -- 2K windowed is not 2K scaled, so there aren't the benefits of downsampling. Only less than a quarter of the full S35mm sensor or 35mm/4K capability. Working as a 16mm camera. Still, you'll need for S16/16mm or B4 mount lenses if you want to go wider. The magnification factor will compromise the 35mm glass use, unless for tele purposes (@FOV level). But without changes @DOF. Although the 2K windowed DOF will surely be different than from the 35mm/4K format.

Not my ballpark, anyway.

Sports can go well. But not so wider or cinematic (4K compared). Even with the proper S16/16mm or B4 mount dedicated glass, wider yes. Apart the 35mm shallower DOF style. And nice for ENG/EFP and one-operator-show style 'cause the deep DOF properties. However, even for sports and following the sport photography, it doesn't seem that we can assume a deep perspective preference -- targeting its core point-of-view. Given by the shallow DOF and not for its opposite. The imaging craft (it doesn't matter where) is always a balance from all you can get. (from) More. Not less.

Andrew Benz
01-24-2007, 10:45 PM
We put the B4 mount on the Red One Lens mount today and shot some quick tests... we Used a Fuiji HD B4 zoom and Im glad to announce we have a very, very healthy optical margin around the 2k windowed frame...

all you who plan on using your B4 lenses.. today was a good day for you.


Yup but taking this:
http://red.com/formatoptions.htm

...I wouldn't say so. However, maybe Rob may enlight us!

Hi E.,

That's what I thought as well, but Stuart English mentioned at dvinfo.net

At least until there is a B4 mount, using B4 lenses with an adaptor like this -

http://www.zgc.com/zgc.nsf/product/C...256EC9005F5789

- will expand the B4 lens coverage to Super 16mm. So your choice of Super 16mm or B4 for 2K RAW or 2K RGB; or cropped slightly, 1080p or 720p RGB.
So, has RED developed a b4 adaptor similar to the Abakus 132 Converter (Converts 2/3 inch Video Lenses to Super 16 Format) to give us the 2K windowed and all the benefits of such? If so, hello 2K with the b4 converter.:)

Emanuel A.
01-24-2007, 11:27 PM
Hi E.,

That's what I thought as well, but Stuart English mentioned at dvinfo.netSee my edit if you wish. I am a little bit tired after a long long journey today. :)

Emanuel A.
01-24-2007, 11:42 PM
See my edit if you wish. I am a little bit tired after a long long journey today. :)

Here is:


Yup but taking this:
http://red.com/formatoptions.htm

EDIT -- 2K windowed is not 2K scaled, so there aren't the benefits of downsampling. Only less than a quarter of the full S35mm sensor or 35mm/4K capability. Working as a 16mm camera. Still, you'll need for S16/16mm or B4 mount lenses if you want to go wider. The magnification factor will compromise the 35mm glass use, unless for tele purposes (@FOV level). But without changes @DOF. Although the 2K windowed DOF will surely be different than from the 35mm/4K format.

Not my ballpark, anyway.

Sports can go well. But not so wider or cinematic (4K compared). Even with the proper S16/16mm or B4 mount dedicated glass, wider yes. Apart the 35mm shallower DOF style. And nice for ENG/EFP and one-operator-show style 'cause the deep DOF properties. However, even for sports and following the sport photography, it doesn't seem that we can assume a deep perspective preference -- targeting its core point-of-view. Given by the shallow DOF and not for its opposite. The imaging craft (it doesn't matter where) is always a balance from all you can get. (from) More. Not less.

Corrado Silveri
01-25-2007, 12:03 AM
Great news! And thanks, Jarred.
There is any possibilities to see the full resolution frame?
And, again, can you please specify the model/manufacturer of the lens?

Thanks again,
Corrado.

Martin Drew
01-25-2007, 02:42 AM
Hi Jarred

Thanks for that. I am very inerested to see how a B4 lens performs on the RedOne. Which Fujinon lens did you use?

How consistent was the coverage of 2k throughout the zoom range, It must fall off towards the wide end, particularly on a wide zoom. The frame that you posted is the full sensor so I imagine the focal length must have been 50 - 60mm ish. It would be great to see a frame from the widest end of the zoom, that would be really useful for judging worst case coverage.

Any chance of posting one of the frames at full res? If you have a wider shot that would be ideal, it may give a better picture of how a B4 HD lens is going to perform in everyday use.

Martin

Corrado Silveri
01-25-2007, 06:32 AM
Sorry guys,
just a question: the B4 Mount is the 2/3" Bayonet type standard for the Panasonic Cameras?
Trying to find description on the web...

Martin Drew
01-25-2007, 06:51 AM
The B4 mount for 2/3 inch cameras was originally used by Sony, but it became the standard and is now used by pretty much everyone including Panasonic.
M

Corrado Silveri
01-25-2007, 07:26 AM
Thanks Martin,
the doubt coming because "B4" it's not mentioned in the tech specs of ours Panasonic AJ-HDX900.

Jarred Land
01-25-2007, 08:30 AM
So, has RED developed a b4 adaptor similar to the Abakus 132 Converter .:)

That abakus is what we used.. its an optical coverter, it uses (i believe) 2 elements and by guesstimation i would say it lost just under a stop of light.

The Lens was a Fuji HA13x45 1.8 lens. The zoom range is 4.5-59mm.

donatello b
01-25-2007, 08:45 AM
does it change the zoom range ? (field of view - as in does 4.5 remain 4.5 or is it it muliplied by Y x 4.5?)

Martin Drew
01-25-2007, 08:45 AM
Ahh that explains it. the Abekus will magnify the image by a factor of x1.32 (hence the name).

Elcurado. The HDX900 does use B4 mount lenses. they probably don't mention B4 because the mount is so standard.

M

Martin Drew
01-25-2007, 08:56 AM
Jarred.

Did you try the built-in 2x converter as well? Interested to know if that would fill the 4k frame or vignette slightly. You would lose a few more stops, but you could get them back again if you downrezzed to 1080p. Potentially you could eek out a bit more resolution this way.

Martin

Steve Gibby
01-25-2007, 08:59 AM
great news. thanks jared. out of curiosity..was the RS232 connector enabled for use of the zoom servo for the lens?

RS232 isn't necessary to power zoom servos on B4 2/3" zoom lenses. You merely need battery power to the lens, supplied by one of RED's 12 volt auxiliary power outlets and a simple multi-pin connector to match the brand of lens you're using (Canon, Fujinon, etc.). You could also power the zoom servos by an external battery on your tripod or brace, using the same multi-pin connector.

Newer B4 2/3" HD lenses have RS232 circuits to enable all the "smart" features of the lenses, but RED One is a manual camera and will not be able to use those features. Affordable used B4 2/3" HD lenses, without "smart" features will be the best choice for use on RED One. Underneath the lens servo motor there is a switch to change between servo zoom and manual zoom. All focusing and aperture changes will be manual.

Emanuel A.
01-25-2007, 10:21 AM
I'd add since we'll have a non-expensive RED compact zoom, we'll go well. If not, an affordable used B4 2/3" HD lens would be an excellent deal. And it will be for ENG/EFP style use, anyway. Even if @2K sensor's area.

Jarred Land
01-25-2007, 10:28 AM
Ahh that explains it. the Abekus will magnify the image by a factor of x1.32 (hence the name).
M

yes indeed.. and if we took it with the Abekus 230 converter we could actually go b4 all the way to 4k... non windowed, at the expense of visual image quality loss, and more light loss.

Emanuel A.
01-25-2007, 10:48 AM
Indeed.

Here is some useful info related, as well:

«BTW, on lenses, beware of the 2/3" video lenses that were designed for 3-chip cameras . . . these lenses need an apochromatic adapter in order to be used properly on a single-chip system without any chromatic shifting or other chromatic aberations. This is due to 2/3" 3-chip lenses being specificatlly constructed to offset for the different focal points that the red, green, and blue sensors have in a 3-chip camera.»

~ Jason Rodriguez in dvxuser.com :) [LINK (http://www.dvxuser.com/V6/showpost.php?p=733424&postcount=7)]

Steve Gibby
01-25-2007, 11:53 AM
Indeed.

Here is some useful info related, as well:

«BTW, on lenses, beware of the 2/3" video lenses that were designed for 3-chip cameras . . . these lenses need an apochromatic adapter in order to be used properly on a single-chip system without any chromatic shifting or other chromatic aberations. This is due to 2/3" 3-chip lenses being specificatlly constructed to offset for the different focal points that the red, green, and blue sensors have in a 3-chip camera.»

~ Jason Rodriguez in dvxuser.com :) [LINK (http://www.dvxuser.com/V6/showpost.php?p=733424&postcount=7)]

Good point Emanuel...

The Fujinon HA13x4.5 wide angle lens that Jarred is using is an ENG/EFP zoom lens designed for 3 chip cameras. As Jarred mentioned, he's using that lens with an Abakas 132 converter, probably to solve the issues that Jason mentioned in his post. RED hasn't announced the exact technology of their B4 2/3" mount/adaptor/converter, so it is feasible that they may design a converter similar to the Abakas. I'm sure RED is aware of the tech issues for using B4 2/3" HD ENG lenses with RED One.

Jarred Land
01-25-2007, 11:57 AM
absolutely Gibby... the addition of the elements in-between help offset the CCD issues.. and gives the Mysterium sensor a more balanced image to capture.

We havn't ruled out a non-optical element solution yet.. We just wanted to make sure the current solution will work on the Red camera for those who need to have B4 mount support out of the gate.

Blair S. Paulsen
01-25-2007, 01:36 PM
Big shout out for jumping on the B4 mount issue, even to the point of wanting to support it right out of the gate - WOW. Once the Red 18-85 Zoom is in my hands the B4 lens will work a lot less but it would be a huge piece of the puzzle for me in this first year of the Red.

What about the comparison between the windowed Mysterium/Bayer and a 3-CCD camera in terms of image quality? If the RedOne gives me more dynamic range (11 stops has been discussed) and offers me a RAW color space for grading I feel pretty good about the RedOne's ability to win that one easily.

Scott Webster
01-25-2007, 02:17 PM
This is great news Jarred. This is the Abakus adapter that the Red team have trialed:

'Abakus 132 Converter Product Code 120

This is for the direct optical conversion of 2/3" video lenses into super-16 format. The stainless steel B4 mount at the front of the unit fits onto the rear of B4 mount video lenses. The rear of the unit interfaces with super-16 cameras using an Arri PL mount. Between the mounts is a system of high quality optics, so there is no loss of quality. The unit maximises the use of video lenses for cine super-16.'

Do you think there has been any compromise on image quality by using the Abakus?

The ability to use B4 lenses, HD Cine or HD ENG, with the benefit of the 2K window that allows the longer record times on Reddrive:

2Kx1080 RAW @ 24p - 6.4 MB/sec - about 9 hrs
2Kx1080 RAW @ 25p - 6.7 MB/sec - about 8 1/2 hrs
2Kx1080 RAW @ 30p - 8.1MB/sec - bit over 7 hrs
2Kx1080 RAW @ 50p - 13.4 MB/sec - about 4 1/3 hrs
2Kx1080 RAW @ 60p - 16.1 MB/sec - about 3 1/2 hrs

This really does open the Red up for endless possibilities as a production camera. 2K wedding coverage anyone?

Brook Willard
01-25-2007, 02:42 PM
What about the comparison between the windowed Mysterium/Bayer and a 3-CCD camera in terms of image quality? If the RedOne gives me more dynamic range (11 stops has been discussed) and offers me a RAW color space for grading I feel pretty good about the RedOne's ability to win that one easily.

Well, the 3CCD cameras you're probably referring to will have a lower resolution, more limited color space, higher compression, significant chroma subsampling, narrower dynamic range and no noteworthy upgradability. And they'll probably cost more.

So... hooray!

Brook Willard
01-25-2007, 05:46 PM
...B4 mount support out of the gate.

*snicker*

Stuart English
01-25-2007, 07:48 PM
Reference - http://red.com/images/photo_zoom/redone_14.jpg

Closest to lens side of the camera - three circular connectors

Upper - EVF interface
Middle - LCD interface
Lower - B4 lens interface.

This interface can provide 12V power via the industry standard 12 pin connector to a 2/3" broadcast power zoom lens.

Steve Gibby
01-25-2007, 08:05 PM
That's awesome...thanks for that added info on the taps Stuart, and a giant thanks to RED for including 12v auxiliary power in RED One! It goes a long way toward enabling the flexibility and utility of RED One.

Thanks...

John Reed
01-25-2007, 08:56 PM
Reference - http://red.com/images/photo_zoom/redone_14.jpg

Closest to lens side of the camera - three circular connectors

Upper - EVF interface
Middle - LCD interface
Lower - B4 lens interface.

This interface can provide 12V power via the industry standard 12 pin connector to a 2/3" broadcast power zoom lens.
Hey Stewart - thanks for you info -
will it be a Canon or Fuji pin?
my vote is Canon
thanks again
John

Mike Devlin
01-25-2007, 09:11 PM
I am probably being thick-headed late at night here, but I don't understand the post by Reedpi. We have used Fujinon (primarily), Canon and Angenieux ENG lenses on our Cameras (Sony F900R and Sony HDC1500) and they all fit the same lens connector on the camera body, which I think of as the Sony lens connector (not Fuji or Canon).

Zoom and Focus controllers are a completely different matter.

Steve Gibby
01-25-2007, 09:20 PM
Power to HD and SD B4 2/3" lenses is definitely via an industry standard 12 pin connector, as Stuart mentioned. Each lens manufacturer has their own multi-pin connectors for zoom and focus controllers.

Blair S. Paulsen
01-26-2007, 01:20 AM
Multipin control interface to remote transceiver like on a robotic camera or jib head should allow for focus pulling and more on a B4 lens. Might be a nice option when shooting wide open even with the more liberal apparent DoF in the windowed modes (2k or 1080) that the B4 implementation supports.

In a perfect world "Cine style" work would always be done on a S35 or 35 lens with a proper follow focus rig. However, due to the ubiquity, convenience and relative affordability of B4 glass - we will be asked to shoot cine style on B4 and it would be handy if there was a way to take advantage of the existing interface. Perhaps there really is no substitute for a proper follow focus rig or an operator who can rack for themselves but I can't help but wonder.

Brook Willard
01-26-2007, 01:25 AM
Reference - http://red.com/images/photo_zoom/redone_14.jpg

Closest to lens side of the camera - three circular connectors

Upper - EVF interface
Middle - LCD interface
Lower - B4 lens interface.

This interface can provide 12V power via the industry standard 12 pin connector to a 2/3" broadcast power zoom lens.

Thank you for posting this.

Mike Devlin
01-26-2007, 06:23 AM
Power to HD and SD B4 2/3" lenses is definitely via an industry standard 12 pin connector, as Stuart mentioned. Each lens manufacturer has their own multi-pin connectors for zoom and focus controllers.

Thanks Gibby. I was fairly certain that was the case. I assumed "industry standard" meant Sony did it first and then everyone else went along, sort of like the B4 mount itself and V-mount batteries and many other things.

Shane Kelly
02-05-2007, 01:01 PM
I have one of these Abakus B4 converters for sale if anyone's interested. Email me if you like.
Regards,
Shane.

JD Holloway
02-05-2007, 07:20 PM
Great news Red Team!

This is an important step to making RED a versatile tool. I'm very glad this option was not overlooked. Especially considering how much reality TV gets shot these days.