Question on CTL (2k)

[Simon Blackledge]

Ok I think I know the answer but thought I'd ask.

I'm not trying to pick holes.. It's a technical question that I'm just intrested to know the answer to, and the only reason I stepped through the shot is that I thought the muzzle flashes looked so bleeding cool!:)

If you have the CTL trailer goto 00:01:44 and step through the shot.

The cut-off on the muzzle flashes.. is this just down to the rate of fire and the way the sensor is read ?

cheers

S

[Nick Shaw]

I noticed that too, but didn't bring it up for fear of starting another debate about shutter artefacts from a prototype camera!

[Simon Blackledge]

..right so if it kicks off blame me eh! :-p lol..

[Laco Zamba]

Jim's answer http://www.reduser.net/forum/showthread.php?t=3803&page=13

[Álex Montoya]

Yeah, it's in the end of 1:44. It's kinda funny. Anyway they have stated that these kind of artifacts have been reduced a lot since then.

And that wasn't really Jim answering to that but to a gamma shift.

[Simon Blackledge]

As I tried to explain above.. just wondering what caused that look of the flash.. not saying it's an issue.

cheers

s

[Álex Montoya]

It's the all famous rolling shutter of the CMOS chips.

[Laco Zamba]

Yes, not goog link to answer - sorry

Do you mean this?

[Simon Blackledge]

Cool thanks.

S

[Evan Owen]

Yes, not goog link to answer - sorry

Do you mean this?

From what I've heard, most (if not all?) of those muzzle flashes were added in post anyway, so I wouldn't look to carefully at those.

[Álex Montoya]

Nope. The muzzles were real. It was confirmed by Jim himself.

http://www.reduser.net/forum/uploaded/1434_1188482773.jpg

There're more examples, though I am not a bit worried. As I said it has been stated that this problem has already been sufficiently addressed in the newer cameras.

[Laco Zamba]

I'm not worried much too, but strange is that it's not straight horizontal cut. Isn't there optical/lens reason?