Mike N
02-17-2010, 11:16 AM
Hello,
I've just finished shooting a personal project on the RED and I was considering options for post concerning image quality since not all editing applications support the new color science.
I did a little test to see what i would lose in quality between the old color science and the new one. The results were pretty incredible since I can't see any real difference between footage processed with the old Redcine vs. footage from Redcine-X. That being said I remember users posting before/after comparisons of their footage back when the new build supporting the new color science was released.
I shot using build 21 with HMI or gelled (CTB) light sources. Could this be why the differences (if any) are so hard to see ?
to illustrate i'm going to post some crops from a frame I exported from Redcine and Redcine-X.
Both sets of crops were processed with the same settings (Camera RGB, Gama 709) but the difference is that on the second set I tried to also match the color temperature because as you can imagine there is a difference in color between the 2 applications.
I shot at 5100K and in Redcine I had to lower down the collor temp to 4187K to make them look almost the same.
I uploaded all the files in an archive which you can download from this location: (changed download location, first one was very slow)
http://drop.io/RedTest#
Password if it asks: redtest
I would directly upload them here but each TIFF file has about 2.5 megs and I don't know if I can upload a size this big or if it's a good idea to do this.
I also put the whole frame in JPG format just for reference.
After seeing this I have a hard time not choosing CS4 and importing the Red files directly over choosing Avid with it's Metafuze since it's the only software on the PC that supports the new color science.
So what's your opinion about this.
thanks,
Mike
I've just finished shooting a personal project on the RED and I was considering options for post concerning image quality since not all editing applications support the new color science.
I did a little test to see what i would lose in quality between the old color science and the new one. The results were pretty incredible since I can't see any real difference between footage processed with the old Redcine vs. footage from Redcine-X. That being said I remember users posting before/after comparisons of their footage back when the new build supporting the new color science was released.
I shot using build 21 with HMI or gelled (CTB) light sources. Could this be why the differences (if any) are so hard to see ?
to illustrate i'm going to post some crops from a frame I exported from Redcine and Redcine-X.
Both sets of crops were processed with the same settings (Camera RGB, Gama 709) but the difference is that on the second set I tried to also match the color temperature because as you can imagine there is a difference in color between the 2 applications.
I shot at 5100K and in Redcine I had to lower down the collor temp to 4187K to make them look almost the same.
I uploaded all the files in an archive which you can download from this location: (changed download location, first one was very slow)
http://drop.io/RedTest#
Password if it asks: redtest
I would directly upload them here but each TIFF file has about 2.5 megs and I don't know if I can upload a size this big or if it's a good idea to do this.
I also put the whole frame in JPG format just for reference.
After seeing this I have a hard time not choosing CS4 and importing the Red files directly over choosing Avid with it's Metafuze since it's the only software on the PC that supports the new color science.
So what's your opinion about this.
thanks,
Mike