DRX in Rocketcine-X

[Gunleik Groven]

Yup. It doesn't work.

Will this be fixed.

I know I can "workaround" by rendering with RCX, but as that is a lot more prone to crashes an inconsistencies than rocketcine-X, it's not really an option.

Maybe the new redline fixes this in some way?

Ideas?

Gunleik

[Ido Karilla]

Hi,

I have looked around and can not find an explanation as to what is DRX exactly.

I find it very useful but what is it?

Thanks.

[Deanan]

DRX is not in rocket which is why it's not in rocketcinex.
In RCX, you have to be in software mode to use drx.

[Ido Karilla]

DRX is not in rocket which is why it's not in rocketcinex.
In RCX, you have to be in software mode to use drx.



Please, what is DRX?

[Gunleik Groven]

Why isn't it in the rocket?
I really like DRX...

DRX is alligning the channels so they roll into white at the same level, thus giving very nice non-tinted roll-offs into white when images over-expose.

[Deanan]

Why isn't it in the rocket?
I really like DRX...

DRX is alligning the channels so they roll into white at the same level, thus giving very nice non-tinted roll-offs into white when images over-expose.

The algorithm for DRX is very hard to get into hardware. We're still trying to get it in.

[Gunleik Groven]

The algorithm for DRX is very hard to get into hardware. We're still trying to get it in.

Good!

[conrad gaunt]

Why isn't it in the rocket?
I really like DRX...

DRX is alligning the channels so they roll into white at the same level, thus giving very nice non-tinted roll-offs into white when images over-expose.

I thought DRX did a bit more than that. I could be wrong. My belief was that it tries to extend clipped channel data by analysing non-clipped sensor data from other channels, in surrounding pixels, thus trying to "statistically" extend Dynamic Range into the super white zone, kind of like the way de-bayering interpolates the missing channels, but for colour (range), for retrieving details that have clipped in one or more channels, but not all channels.

If it doesn't do that, then maybe it doesn't stand for Dynamic Range X-tention either.. i just assumed?!

[Gunleik Groven]

I thought DRX did a bit more than that. I could be wrong. My belief was that it tries to extend clipped channel data by analysing non-clipped sensor data from other channels, in surrounding pixels, thus trying to "statistically" extend Dynamic Range into the super white zone, kind of like the way de-bayering interpolates the missing channels, but for colour, for retrieving details that have clipped in one or more channels, but not all channels.

If it doesn't do that, then maybe it doesn't stand for Dynamic Range X-tention either.. i just assumed?!

Could well be... Looks great, though. My favourite Color Science...