View Full Version : who votes for more mac footage?..
Roberto B
10-03-2007, 07:32 AM
i am the first..
time for a poll..
Kyle Mallory
10-03-2007, 08:06 AM
Too funny.
Noah Kadner
10-03-2007, 12:41 PM
How about a little taste from Soderbergh- I bet his stuff looks dope!
-Noah
Harmonica
10-03-2007, 03:07 PM
I don't see "both" in the options...
Simon Smith
10-03-2007, 03:14 PM
I'd vote for both. Not being possible then, mac twice. The Sanjin hostility is nonsense.
Clayton Harper
10-03-2007, 07:03 PM
Oh damn, this is the funniest thing on here since Shawn Nelson got sleepy.
Jeremy Teman
10-04-2007, 11:40 AM
Everyone needs to listen to Sanjin. He is THE connoisseur of Red. Pffffftt!!
The Mac footage was awesome
Miguel "Macgregor" De Olaso
10-05-2007, 02:02 AM
Some more footage for you, gentlemen:
http://www.macgregor.autoecstasy.com/engagement/image0.jpg
www.macgregor.autoecstasy.com/engagement/clips3.mov
Music by Aaron Marshall.
Sanjin Jukic
10-05-2007, 02:13 AM
Sanjin, stop it! Or I will post your tango clip in Paris. And we can all watch what you're capable when you have a camera to shoot.
Mr.Orange I do it for you the link and find it below.
http://www.sanjinjukic.com/old/tango_paris.jpg
Photo from "The Street Tango in Paris", web movie.
And I am in the competition with Macgregor or with anybody else.
My critics has nothing to do with what I am doing or what I would be able to do.
They are two separate worlds. Let's make it clear.
This documentary TEST clip titled "The Street Tango in Paris" (http://www.sanjinjukic.com/old/tangoparis_popup.html) was shot in Rue Montorgueil, Paris, shot from Café SANTI (http://paris.2.evous.fr/Santi,341.html), Summer 2004.
And it was shot with "faulty" JVC GR-PD1 (MiniDV/MPEG2) (http://www.simplydv.co.uk/Reviews/jvc_grpd1.html) camcorder that was a kind of PAL version of the big brother NTSC JVC GR HD1.
Now I remember well the first days of HDV and all those problems with the first encoding software, all that mess and cameras.
By the way I like to shoot a documentary, to catch a breath of real life.
I'm calling it a sort of row-life documentary-style shooting.
It is simple like this: You see something, immediately take you cam from your bag/pocket and start to shoot.
A lot of us are doing the same daily.
Nothing new.
For other serious work you have to do a lot of preparations.
For me Ingmar Bergman was the best. He had a crew whole day on the location and successfully was capturing just 10-20 sec of the movie daily.
You have to wait for a long time to catch a real life in your camera or spontaneous reaction of actor/actress you want to have.
It is like painting with oil.
You always do re-paint and try to get the best.
But that cost a lot.
Simon Smith
10-05-2007, 11:12 AM
Sanjin, stop it! Or I will post your tango clip in Paris. And we can all watch what you're capable when you have a camera to shoot.
indianaG5
10-05-2007, 11:38 AM
Hi Mac... sec 30' to 36' .... just.. wow! :whistling:
Sanjin Jukic
10-05-2007, 11:42 AM
Mr.Orange I do it for you the link and find it below.
http://www.sanjinjukic.com/old/tango_paris.jpg
Photo from "The Street Tango in Paris", web movie.
And I am in the competition with Macgregor or with anybody else.
My critics has nothing to do with what I am doing or what I would be able to do.
They are two separate worlds. Let's make it clear.
This documentary TEST clip titled "The Street Tango in Paris" (http://www.sanjinjukic.com/old/tangoparis_popup.html) was shot in Rue Montorgueil, Paris, shot from Café SANTI (http://paris.2.evous.fr/Santi,341.html), Summer 2004.
And it was shot with "faulty" JVC GR-PD1 (MiniDV/MPEG2) (http://www.simplydv.co.uk/Reviews/jvc_grpd1.html) camcorder that was a kind of PAL version of the big brother NTSC JVC GR HD1.
Now I remember well the first days of HDV and all those problems with the first encoding software, all that mess and cameras.
By the way I like to shoot a documentary, to catch a breath of real life.
I'm calling it a sort of row-life documentary-style shooting.
It is simple like this: You see something, immediately take you cam from your bag/pocket and start to shoot.
A lot of us are doing the same daily.
Nothing new.
For other serious work you have to do a lot of preparations.
For me Ingmar Bergman was the best. He had a crew whole day on the location and successfully was capturing just 10-20 sec of the movie daily.
You have to wait for a long time to catch a real life in your camera or spontaneous reaction of actor/actress you want to have.
It is like painting with oil.
You always do re-paint and try to get the best.
But that cost a lot.
Simon Smith
10-05-2007, 12:54 PM
Sanjin, I like your posts. You are an educated, curious, interested poster. But you think that you are more skillful or smart than the others. A few posts from you are mere show off. You know nothing about the others stuff. You're posting deleuze when seems to a good student of the french master that you don't know very well about you're talking about. As I already told you. It's not enough to buy or even read the books. It's necessary to study them. Your knowledge is very superficial. Your mind is full of names, quotes, knowledge with poor connection between. Like the Bible before Christ.
Thank you for the link. So, I have no need to post it... :)
I wouldn't post it anyway just for not to embarasse you, as I could tell you by PM. I don't post what I think about your piece of documentary, aside your attempts to paste names and names. May you learn something with me and sorry my arrogant suggestion! Though I may tell you there are a lot of similar clips in every camcorder that passed in that corner of the Rue Montorgueil. You've been talking about mac locations. Your approach is cheap if compared with macgregor's. You haven't been adding nothing at all to your 'art'. No matters which misconception you have about this. You have a lot to learn with mac or Deleuze. We all have. Deleuze is also useful for him, yes.
Now, all here can understand how unfair your comments are, about who has actually shown something substantially better or different (funny word used over here right?) than yours. Wait for your Red. Quiet. Without posting comments about the work of others when you have NO past to emit THAT opinion.
Sanjin Jukic
10-05-2007, 01:03 PM
Jawohl, Herr.Orange!
Quite amazed this thread haven't been removed by the moderators...
Anyways I got to say I liked your little clip from Paris Sanjin. It reminded me of a trip I had to Paris a couple of months ago. How was the GR-PD1 handling? Never tried that cam.
Gordon Prince
10-05-2007, 02:25 PM
Anyways I got to say I liked your little clip from Paris Sanjin. It reminded me of a trip I had to Paris a couple of months ago. Mr. Orange should have so much laugh with this comment.
Sanjin Jukic
10-05-2007, 02:26 PM
Anyways I got to say I liked your little clip from Paris Sanjin. It reminded me of a trip I had to Paris a couple of months ago. How was the GR-PD1 handling? Never tried that cam.
Crap. Very badly. Difficult to manual control. Encoding problems due 50fps recording, codec problems, audio sync issues etc. It was not good buy at all. And sometimes can produce good pictures. But you have to "guess".
Simon Smith
10-05-2007, 02:31 PM
Mr. Orange should have so much laugh with this comment.Actually not. But that's the point. Refrain yourself to be so affirmative, Sanjin. You've just been a dumb acting like that. Deleuze wouldn't approve.
Second one: cameras are just a tool. No mess encoding software justifies your crappy clip.
Sanjin Jukic
10-05-2007, 02:41 PM
Actually not. But that's the point. Refrain yourself to be so affirmative, Sanjin. You've just been a dumb acting like that. Deleuze wouldn't approve.
Second one: cameras are just a tool. No mess encoding software justifies your crappy clip.
"Crappy life" that could be a good title for the new feature film from...
Simon Smith
10-05-2007, 02:43 PM
Talk about you do know.
Mr. Orange should have so much laugh with this comment.
Gordon, your maturity shines clear by this comment. Cheers
Crap. Very badly. Difficult to manual control. Encoding problems due 50fps recording, codec problems, audio sync issues etc. It was not good buy at all. And sometimes can produce good pictures. But you have to "guess".
Well this seems common with a lot of consumer cameras. But don't it have a manual ring?
Gordon Prince
10-05-2007, 03:21 PM
Gordon, your maturity shines clear by this comment. CheersFix, my maturity shines clear after a good laugh after your comment. Cheers
Talk about you do know.
Fix, my maturity shines clear after a good laugh after your comment. Cheers
Thank you for making my point.
Gordon Prince
10-05-2007, 03:38 PM
You're welcome.
Simon Smith
10-05-2007, 03:39 PM
:sarcasm:
Gordon Prince
10-05-2007, 03:40 PM
:) :calm:
Häakon
10-05-2007, 03:47 PM
Enough, please.