PDA

View Full Version : A camera friendly race car



Johnny St.Ours
11-14-2007, 01:39 PM
So, I've been filming this race car project for some time, and one thing about it, is that there really hasn't been a race car yet- they're still building it. But there will come a day when this phenomenal car hits LeMans' 24 hour race- and hopefully this June. Since I can give my own input into the design of the car, I've been hinking about carving out little spots for my camera. I've had a few thoughts and questions, and some of them may be ridiculous, but I thought I'd vent them on this forum and maybe there's merit to one or two.

Thinking about stabilizing, and how I don't want this to be some NASCAR helmet cam race coverage, but more cinematic and smooth. My documentary is forming in a narrative vein, so I'm not trying to cover the race, but convey the feeling of the race. I think the camera should be smooth, and I'm not sure how to stabilize it. The car will be reaching 200mph. Maybe some gyro deal? Sounds expesnive- and heavy. This is a real competition so nobody's gonna let me weigh down their car too much.

I was also thinking about periscopes. I'd like an angle of view on the outside of the car. Looking past the front wheel or, maybe even looking back at the driver through the windshield from the nose. Sticking a big 'ol camera rig on the side of the car is not going to be an option- it'll create serious drag, and probably get destroyed to boot. I started thinking about creating a little periscope mirror system, so the camera's inside, looking out. Is that plain dumb, or anybody try it? Then my thoughts start really going; say I got hold of a RED (which is my intention and goal) and I've got 6 times the resolution of my JVC which shot the movie thus far, what if I split it? Bolt the camera to the frame of the car, in the most secure and low CG spot I can find, and point it at a prism of periscopes- like 4, that basically bust up the frame into four different simultaneaous angles of the exterior, interior, rearview, etc. and hook the camera to a hard drive and just let it go. In post I cut out the quadrant I want and blow it up to full screen. Of course this is a focus and stability trial in itself- but is it also just plain stupid? The thought is again about weight and drag and balance. If I let the engineer's decide where the heavy camera and hard drive sit, and all I do is run some periscopes around, maybe the car will actually still race.

The other thing I keep thinking about is the car's unique history. It's a Ford GT, which is pretty special in the Motorsports books, especially for an American car. But one thing that's special about it too, is that it was actually one of the camera car types used to film Grand Prix- which is cinemagraphically speaking, my biggest inspiration in this effort. Anybody out there know anything about the filming of the flick? The late Lionel Linden was the Cinematographer on the picture, but maybe somebody knows somebody who helped out? Maybe somebody knows somebody who remembers how they mounted up their GT, or just interested in chatting with me, or trying it out all over again at leMans? I believe that all the original Ford GTs are accounted for and are no longer equipped with camera mounts, but I'd love to see pictures or hear stories from that production, even if I'll never see one the cars.

I got to go, the wife is waiting, but I'll post some more later and love to hear any thoughts you all got out there.

chuck colburn
11-14-2007, 01:46 PM
Here's a car that has more camera mounting points then you probally need.

http://www.arielatom.com/?gclid=COK2hvim3Y8CFQaAgwodIAyY8A

Erik Bien
11-14-2007, 01:56 PM
I guess that answers the question, 'Is it possible to build a go-kart out of speed rail?'

chuck colburn
11-14-2007, 02:01 PM
They are pretty spiffy cars. Built here in Ashland, Or. I've chased a couple of them up and down Dead Indian Road on my friends Ducati 749SS. Couldn't get by one going either way. lol

John Hunt
11-15-2007, 01:31 AM
Yeah, those Ariel Atoms look neat, but that's an awful lot of money for a space frame chassis...

If this car is running Le Mans, your mounting options will be extremely limited. Not just weight and balance issues, but access needs by mechanics and engineers will heavily limit the viability of complex set-ups. Vibration issues are huge, too - race cars transmit heavy-duty vibrations thru every mounting point.

Simplest strategy would be to establish a variety of mounting points and swap camera positions in long pit stops. That is if you could sell the engineers on the idea of moving RED's weight around a 2000 lb car. There are one or two very small, remote hi-def camera heads out there that might better serve your purpose...maybe find a way to connect them to a RED body, shoot 2k windowed and move just the heads around?

Also, there is a documentary on the making of Le Mans that was on Speed Channel a few years ago - I have it around here somewhere...

I'm surprised a vintage Ford GT is Le Mans legal - didn't know they had a vintage class...maybe I should enter my old Lola too!

Good luck -

Johnny St.Ours
11-15-2007, 06:25 AM
You're right about it all. Tough stuff. I was thinking about the iconix camera as an option, I have no experience with it yet- but it's probably closer to the answer.
It's not vintage, it's the new GT they came out with in 2003- based on the 60s leMans design. Although production ceased after about 3,000, the officials have OK'ed it for homologation. This will be the first leMans entry of this modern machine.
I suspect it will draw some attention.
Funny, I watched the making of Grand Prix, but duh, I haven't watched the one for Le Mans yet. Guess I've got a stop to make at my video store.

The Ariel Atom sure would make for a fun and fast tripod, wouldn't it?

John Hunt
11-15-2007, 10:00 AM
yeah, iconix is what I had in mind...

sorry, I misread your first post - thought you had one of the original GT40 camera cars - the new one is a great car - I have seen a few at local events and they're pretty stout even in stock form - good luck

Johnny St.Ours
11-15-2007, 12:07 PM
What about this kind of stuff:
http://www.ken-lab.com/html/vertical_remote_mount.html

the stock GT is an epic car. I was in one the other day at 175mph- it did that speed like my Nissan pickup does 75- you could tell it had a lot more in it. That car tops out at 205- the one being built for leMans is supposed to have almost 1000HP and go 240 or something- but we'll see.

John Hunt
11-16-2007, 09:43 AM
you have many options available, so I'd start with known weight and location restrictions from car engineers and work backward from there...once you know how much weight and where they'll let you put it, you can narrow your field of mounts, cameras, and lenses. Simpler is better for sure.

PaulClements
11-16-2007, 09:55 AM
Well I presume you can offset the weight of the camera against any balast imposed on the car? What about using something like this (http://www.visualproducts.com/storeProductDetail03.asp?productID=876&Cat=8&Cat2=18&Cat3=25) so you can mount the camera inside the car and have it periscoped outside one of the windows?

Incidently, talking about cool facts to do with cars. One of my friends had a hand in building the Bugati Veyron. Under his authority they actually made it one inch longer lol.

Paul

Johnny St.Ours
11-16-2007, 12:57 PM
Now THAT'S what I'm talking about!
The bugati, eh? we were talking about how that's the car to beat in Top Speed. Didn't it do 255mph or something?
Heck of a machine- your pal did a good job.