Dongfang Hong
12-06-2007, 11:58 AM
In response to Jim Jannard's "Delays and Frustration..." post in the Red One forum, I'd like to say that delay is fine by me as I can't afford a full set of PL mount glass anyway. I won't need the camera until the Nikon mount is available.
However, like I posted elsewhere in that forum, I hope the RED team would consider the P+S interchangeable lens mount concept or even work with them to cut down development time.
http://www.pstechnik.de/en/optics-ims.php
I'd really want to be able to swap between Leica R (wishfully Leica M also), Contax, Nikon, Canon Hasselblad or even PL mount (a particular focal length instead of a full set) lenses on set easily. With the corresponding interchangeable mount already attached to a particular lens (literally a universal adapter), it would be very handy in the real world situation. This universal mount will certainly make the camera system more flexible for a lot of us.
I hope my voice represents a significant number of RED users and is heard by the decision makers in the company. If not, I hope P+S or any third party could step up and do something along this line for us.
However, like I posted elsewhere in that forum, I hope the RED team would consider the P+S interchangeable lens mount concept or even work with them to cut down development time.
http://www.pstechnik.de/en/optics-ims.php
I'd really want to be able to swap between Leica R (wishfully Leica M also), Contax, Nikon, Canon Hasselblad or even PL mount (a particular focal length instead of a full set) lenses on set easily. With the corresponding interchangeable mount already attached to a particular lens (literally a universal adapter), it would be very handy in the real world situation. This universal mount will certainly make the camera system more flexible for a lot of us.
I hope my voice represents a significant number of RED users and is heard by the decision makers in the company. If not, I hope P+S or any third party could step up and do something along this line for us.