View Full Version : Adobe’s Magical 3D Lens
simonfilm
02-21-2008, 11:00 AM
Kind of this would be a real innovation and surprise!
http://blog.flowseeker.com/?p=51
dillont
02-21-2008, 11:17 AM
Holy cow!
This enables some pretty remarkable artistic techniques in post - when people say "We'll fix it in post", it'll have a whole new meaning.:gun:
Ameer Azari
02-21-2008, 12:15 PM
OH MY GOD!!!!
I bet that's gonna cost a bomb though...
BUT STILL!! OH MY GOD!!
Andrew Hewlett
02-21-2008, 12:17 PM
WOW. Thats something!
Ameer Azari
02-21-2008, 12:53 PM
how much do you reckon it'll cost?
and when do you think they'll release it?
David Birdy
02-21-2008, 01:06 PM
The future has amazing depth of field!
Kreisky
02-21-2008, 01:15 PM
I call it:"The Insect"
Great Job !
makes sense to me whithout reading a dummie book !
It wont work on the RED ONE (lens has to be much bigger than the Camera),
but I understand why you posted it at Scarlet forum !
Kreisky (RedDummie)
Rudi Herbert
02-21-2008, 02:18 PM
I bet this is the "game changer" that Mark from Ofhollywood was talking about...
Michael Schrengohst
02-21-2008, 02:37 PM
Here is some more info:
Just Imagine this on a RED,
fix exposure and focus in post!
http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/3d-magic/adobe-tinkering-with-3d-image-manipulation-using-camera-and-software-%5Bupdated-with-video%5D-308659.php
dillont
02-21-2008, 02:56 PM
Computational Photography!
Steve Freebairn
02-21-2008, 09:31 PM
Count me in for buying one of those (given it's not too much). It seems like you'd need a 200 megapixel sensor if you were going to split it 50 different ways.
jbeale
02-21-2008, 09:47 PM
It's been a research topic for some time- looking forward to seeing some practical cameras come out of it! For some background, see: http://graphics.stanford.edu/projects/lightfield/
Frank Weeks
02-21-2008, 09:48 PM
Wow. That is interesting!
Andrew McCarrick
02-21-2008, 10:36 PM
My question would be are you losing resolution per image? Those various angles have to be stored somewhere.... you can't stack a bunch of angles on one pixel.
John Godden
02-21-2008, 11:38 PM
This is just vaporware. Come back in 4+ years when you have something solid.
JohnG
Michele Gavazzeni
02-21-2008, 11:52 PM
Brilliant !!!!!!!
Eugene
02-22-2008, 10:54 AM
This is old news. I read about it a year or so ago.
A moderator needs to move this to the Off Topic section. :angry03:
Antoine Fabi
02-23-2008, 09:11 AM
Ouch !!!!!
Fantastic if they can get good optical quality out of it.
David Birdy
02-23-2008, 10:11 AM
Great post Thanks Simon!
Kevin Lang
02-23-2008, 10:57 AM
Holy !@#! That is cool as hell! I must have one.