10,000 Bc

[Emery Wells]

I just saw 10,000 BC tonight and if anyone hasn't seen it yet you should spare yourself. However, I am curious if anyone knows what it was shot on? There were some ridiculously noisy low light scenes. There was nothing subtle about the noise either. I almost couldn't believe this was passable for a $75,000,000 movie.

[Shawn Nelson]

According to IMDB it's super 35mm anamorphic

[Adam Levins]

I was not planning on seeing it but now I might have to as I have seen a few posts about how noisy it is and I need to see this for myself.

[Shawn Booth]

it just looks like the DP pushed processed. most of those shots are w/o VFX -

[Jay A. Kelley]

I did not like the movie. They spent a lot of time on Mammoths and creating wide shots. But little time on much else.

I was sad it turned out the way it did

Now.. Horton Hears A Who.. That was a great movie.. Lots of fun.

No, I'm not joking..

Jay

[Jaime Vallés]

Yeah, 10,00BC was a very dumbed-down version of Apocalypto. Blah from beginning to end.

I also definitely noticed the incredibly noisy, grainy low-light shots. It was extremely jarring, especially since it wasn't every low-light shot, just some of them. Looked awful.

But I have to say, I had never seen such perfect teeth on a caveman before! :tongue:

[P Andersson]

almost left the theater

[Jeff Kilgroe]

Now.. Horton Hears A Who.. That was a great movie.. Lots of fun.

No, I'm not joking..


I agree. Horton rocks! Well done, they successfully expanded the story to about 90 minutes without too much filler. My only complaint is the recurring use of the word "boob". I suppose they could have said "idiot", "moron", etc.. But now I've got a 2 year old and a 4 year old calling people "boobs". Hehe.