Thread: Wooden Camera PL Mount

Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 27
  1. #11  
    Senior Member Tommaso Alvisi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    ITALY
    Posts
    2,211
    I know, I don't use i/ or LDS, I'm just worried about internal reflections...compare the inside of the RED TI PL Mount to the WC one...
    TOMMASO ALVISI | tommasoalvisi.com
    Weapon 6K Carbon Fiber #1605 aka qp
    instagram | twitter
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #12  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    New Orleans
    Posts
    1,664
    Quote Originally Posted by Kemalettin Sert View Post
    thats why its 350 bucks.NO i/ technology..doesnt support electronics
    At $350 I wouldn't expect i/ or LDS, but I would certainly expect baffling. Fotodiox gives us baffling in $30 adapters.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #13  
    Senior Member Bob Gundu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Toronto, ON Canada
    Posts
    10,030
    I have both and can do a test later tonight.
    ___________________________

    VFX, Cinematographer, Photographer
    10 frame handles
    Vimeo
    Instagram
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #14  
    Senior Member Tommaso Alvisi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    ITALY
    Posts
    2,211
    wow that would be great Bob!
    TOMMASO ALVISI | tommasoalvisi.com
    Weapon 6K Carbon Fiber #1605 aka qp
    instagram | twitter
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #15  
    Quote Originally Posted by Bob Gundu View Post
    I have both and can do a test later tonight.
    So, this was long ago, but did you ever do that test? Should I expect internal reflection issues with the WC mount?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #16  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    NYC, CT
    Posts
    115
    Quote Originally Posted by Cedric Gall View Post
    So, this was long ago, but did you ever do that test? Should I expect internal reflection issues with the WC mount?
    Ive never had an issue- will sell mine for 200 if you want.... just got a TI back when upgraded cam...
    John McCabe
    Epic X 294 Epic X 1148
    MX 712 MX 4896
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #17  
    Senior Member Christoffer Glans's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Stockholm, Sweden
    Posts
    4,218
    Quote Originally Posted by jpmcabe View Post
    Ive never had an issue- will sell mine for 200 if you want.... just got a TI back when upgraded cam...
    I haven't used mine much, but I'm also interested in the internal reflections. Has this been an issue for people or not? Right now I'm using the Canon EF mount with my CN-E lenses, but whenever I'm about to do something bigger I will rent anamorphics or spherical higher priced lenses and it would be nice to know if the WC PL has ny problems or if it's fine except for the obvious lack of electronics. I haven't compared mine to the regular Red PL yet so I'm not sure what else is different.
    "Using any digital cinema camera today is like sending your 35mm rolls to a standard lab. -Using a Red is like owning a dark room."
    Red Weapon 6K #00600
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #18  
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Cyprus
    Posts
    54
    NO issues here, no internal reflections spotted either. As for the readings, me nor my clients ever used PL lenses with readouts. FP never complained about that either. So far so good.
    RED EPIC DRAGON #8131
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #19  
    Senior Member Bob Gundu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Toronto, ON Canada
    Posts
    10,030
    I use the WC one when I want a lighter rig. Works great
    ___________________________

    VFX, Cinematographer, Photographer
    10 frame handles
    Vimeo
    Instagram
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #20  
    Senior Member Christoffer Glans's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Stockholm, Sweden
    Posts
    4,218
    Quote Originally Posted by Evgenios Zosimov View Post
    NO issues here, no internal reflections spotted either. As for the readings, me nor my clients ever used PL lenses with readouts. FP never complained about that either. So far so good.
    Yeah, I don't see a need for electronics for PL unless someone makes lenses with cinema-grade internal motors that works like still lenses (without stepping) and when speaking of electronics for current lenses it's mostly about modern technically perfect lenses, but most of the time I use nice old glass for PL, that's where it shines. My Canon CN-Es work great if I want a sharp "perfect" image.
    "Using any digital cinema camera today is like sending your 35mm rolls to a standard lab. -Using a Red is like owning a dark room."
    Red Weapon 6K #00600
    Reply With Quote  
     

Tags for this Thread

View Tag Cloud

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts