Is the below clause from RED an unusual sales clause for US manufacturers?
Also if a RED owner is unhappy about the stability of the camera in respect to bugs and software recording glitches, is there a returns clause to cover this?
Lets say you wait for build 16, buy the camera but six months later it still has faults.
Will RED refund your bread?
As I see it and please correct me if I'm wrong, with no gaurantee that the camera will deliver any particular specification where does this leave the buyer in the legal sense if their is a differenc of opinion between what is and isnt industry standard or whatever other method of establishing is the camera is "fit for purpose"?
Mike Brennan
UK
"10. INDEMNIFICATION – Buyer shall indemnify, defend, and hold Red and Red’s officers, agents and other representatives harmless from all demands, claims, actions, causes of actions, proceedings, suits, assessments, losses, damages, liabilities, settlements, judgments, fines, penalties, interest, costs and expenses incurred (including fees and disbursements of legal counsel) of every kind (i) based upon personal injury or death or injury to property to the extent any of the foregoing is proximately caused by defective product..."
