This thread is drifting....
|
|
This thread is drifting....
Just throwing it out there: could it be TSMC in Taiwan?
They're a major fab with clients like AMD.
I miss the pre-NAB era of this forum... It was exciting, fresh and you could nearly feel the love!... I guess NAB was something to get our minds off waiting for our camera, giving us some food to fill the hunger...
Now it's the first time I get bored and blazé of reading a thread... It's becoming a f**ing forum, like most of them...
And if one wants to ask a question, even though it most probably have been answered many times, so what? There's new guys around, new customers, and new interest... BTW the search here and anywhere is, well... complicated... Type "sensor" and see what happens... That word (like any other regarding the Red camera) comes up with a zillion answers since it's in almost EVERY post...
It's like going to a store and ask the cashier "do you sell underwear?" and the guy replies "This question was asked to me many times... Why don't you try and search the store first?"...
When I'm in a store I know well (or not), and someone asks me a question, I try and answer... Some just shrugs and say "I don't work here"...
It's a matter of education I guess... Y'know, the good ol' being helpful and stuff...
PS: the answer to the main question of this post is Wonderbra.
(another word to add to your search, try it, only this post will come up for once!)...
PPS: my post if off topic and I don't care, you have made me in a bad mood. First time here. Sad.
Q: " Who makes the Mysterium sensor?" is one of most important questions with RED technology for me, because this sensor is very first element you need to built such camera. All that hype around is nice but it all stands and fall on good sensor. No sensor, no camera, no development, nothing... you got only empty box and your dreams (remeber Kinetta)
But that is just starting line, then you have to deal with all that neverending hw/sw designing and testing development.
As far as I know most important thing with chips is not their manufacturer but their designer. Couple years ago aprox 99% of chips architecture was done by small companies in US and then cheaply manufactured overseas. So more important question is Who is architect of this chip? And why no one from other big companies have it yet?!? Except military of course :shiftyph34r:
(remeber how NASA partly wasted money on Hubble because there was classified rubber mirror technology available (i.e. Adaptive optics) :shiftyph34r:)
Maybe this chip is not just only Jim's child but result of some useful plot betwen him and somebody from chip design industry or so
Whatever... it's definitelly nice example of how excelent new technology is quickly spread between all people and not only to some chosen one or even locked in safes forever.
Do you think that on Mysterium is some hidden chip art? Maybe some funny message from Jim :clown2:
He he, it's time pull out your microscope and search for some hidden fun ;o)
There is like 100 chip designers signatures on MIPS Technologies R4000 :o)
http://smithsonianchips.si.edu/chipfun/graff.htm
![]()
![]()
![]()
time for the glue factory --
| « Previous Thread | Next Thread » |