I would like to hear people who have had the camera in their hands at NAB or in testing. Actual impressions please.
|
I would like to hear people who have had the camera in their hands at NAB or in testing. Actual impressions please.
+1. But more better frames too, if possible. They tell a lot.
Wayne, the point is what you've just said. That's only a mere grade from a pre-production unit to not call it prototype. How can a photoshop grade from a grab tell so much about anything?! I don't even find anything wrong there anyways... : ) You, the guy of innovation himself to approach in a conservative manner on a revolutionary product coming from your own land, that puzzles me, Aussie boy (frankly, long live to Aussies and your Italian surname tells too little now for this matter, of course : )) Without mention people struggle to get decent V-Log L skin tones from 10-bit. Let alone when RAW 12-bit pops up at that price range, to come here and read that from you, the Ambarella supporter number one. Don't forget that I am just one of your loyal readers for more than... how long today? I guess for a decade and a half or so, now! (E :-)
The image from those two stills is more than enough to do what one wants with it. Certainly more robust than many images I have seen from BM over the years.
My only concern is a lack of nuance in the skin tones. You will see they look very even and uniform, but are slightly lacking in separation in the cheeks for instance, on the foreams etc. A tendancy towards "woodenness"` is always a concern of mine with BM. This shows up as a kind of greyness in the highiights of skintones. However, it is difficult to tell how much makeup they are wearing and the intention of whoever did the grade. Basically human beings have more blotchy skin than this (or delicate skin in the case of children). I also see too much contrast in the drink cart behind them by whoever did one of the later grades in the thread and a few other minor concerns. However, frankly I think on balance it looks damn good considering the size of the sensor, and as people who know me will confirm, I am generally a pretty fierce critic of BM (I am a colorist), but I definitely like where I see things going from this cam. Double ISO is going to open up new horizons for them. Further I think the acuity of the image is really quite excellent. I would have no problems accepting materiel from this camera.
I want to underline however, that it still is a camera for controlled environments. These images have been very carefully metered and lit. If you think that these are the results you will obtain as a walkaround cam, you may be in for a bit of a surprise.
Last edited by C. Burkhart; 04-12-2018 at 01:33 AM.
https://youtu.be/Czu8fIBJfcI
I taped some footage with my phone. Not sure if it could help.
You can't judge that based on this shot.
Light, make up, 3200ISO rating, wide shot, grade.
Drink cart has a different light source, harder and stronger, man and woman more subtle soft light.
Exactly.
As with every other camera interior show presentation.
Btw those shots seem as if passed through noise reduction.
I recognize that there is light makeup and a grade. However, what I am referring to is the greyness of the guys hand (supporting his head). This is typically where I have trouble finding a healthy skin tone. I'm not saying it's not there in the original files, it's just those are my areas of concern, because it means going in to do a secondary to a zone like this, which is of course time consuming. Also as you will notice the faces take on a kind of even orangey/brown tone, with little variation in the skin tones. But you know what, this is probably the makeup, so huge grain of salt as to what I am saying. I do very much like the acuity of the images though. It's a good texture and the contrast level seem very healthy as well.
I think the 400 and 3200 mode (this shot is 3200) are extremely clean. On top of that I believe the shot was slightly overexposed and the noise further reduced. And being that it's likely a well-lit scene and the ISO was unnecessarily high (likely fast shutter or something) there is no noise. The 6400 images do look to have considerably more noise but the patterning looks more even than that of the Ursa Mini Pro which has vertical clumping.
« Previous Thread | Next Thread » |