Thread: Canon C500 Mark II

Reply to Thread
Page 11 of 13 FirstFirst ... 78910111213 LastLast
Results 101 to 110 of 128
  1. #101  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    932
    Being able to use more lenses.
    Being able to use better still RF lenses.
    Why do you think Venice is using EF mount instead F55 mount?
    Mirrorless mounts are the way to go.

    Why do you think KOMODO will have RF mount? Ask RED ��
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #102  
    I doesn't look like C500mk2 body design allows 24mm shorter flange distance for RF mount.
    Analog > Apollo wooden handgrip http://omeneo.com
    Digital > Primers - professional image transformation tools http://omeneo.com/primers

    imdb


    "Como delfines en el fondo del oceano
    volamos por el universo incentivados por la esperanza"

    "L'esperanza", Sven Všth
    "It's a poor sort of memory that only works backwards"
    Jung/ Carol
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #103  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    932
    Quote Originally Posted by Hrvoje Simic View Post
    I doesn't look like C500mk2 body design allows 24mm shorter flange distance for RF mount.
    Hmmm, let me think here. Since they start to design camera with blank sheet of paper, is it possible in 2019 to incorporate
    Canon’s new RF mount with their new and latest AF technology and lenses. ?
    Hmm.. it will be very hard. Lets use 10 yr old stupid EF and 100 yr old proven PL mount.
    Congratulations Canon, this is one of the reasons why Sony FX9 will outsell you 10:1.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #104  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Posts
    1,809
    Quote Originally Posted by Jiri Vrozina View Post
    Hmmm, let me think here. Since they start to design camera with blank sheet of paper, is it possible in 2019 to incorporate
    Canonís new RF mount with their new and latest AF technology and lenses. ?
    Hmm.. it will be very hard. Lets use 10 yr old stupid EF and 100 yr old proven PL mount.
    Congratulations Canon, this is one of the reasons why Sony FX9 will outsell you 10:1.
    I don't think so, a set of proper lenses (that you already own) cost a lot more than a $20k camera(which will be obsolete within 3 years time at the current rate).
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #105  
    Senior Member AndreeMarkefors's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    839
    Quote Originally Posted by Jiri Vrozina View Post
    Congratulations Canon, this is one of the reasons why Sony FX9 will outsell you 10:1.
    Meanwhile, elsewhere on the internet:

    Quote Originally Posted by JPNola
    (to Terry Nixon) How do your Fx9 orders compare to your C500MkII orders in volume?
    Quote Originally Posted by Terry Nixon
    50% less than the C500 Mark II.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #106  
    We just got 2 500's....going to start playing with them tomorrow and will go out on a shoot in Jan with them. I can already tell media is going to be hard to get for a while with these.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #107  
    Quote Originally Posted by Remington Chase View Post
    We just got 2 500's....going to start playing with them tomorrow and will go out on a shoot in Jan with them. I can already tell media is going to be hard to get for a while with these.
    Awesome. Looking forward to more feedback on this camera. One of my big questions is what the overcranking above 60 looks like. 120fps on the C200 is mushy and horrible. Iím hoping the C500 II is much better than the C200. Overcranking has always been a major issue for Canon cameras.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #108  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    932
    Quote Originally Posted by Misha Engel View Post
    I don't think so, a set of proper lenses (that you already own) cost a lot more than a $20k camera(which will be obsolete within 3 years time at the current rate).
    And where does it stop you to use them on “c500 with RF Mount? or Komodo?.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #109  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    932
    Quote Originally Posted by AndreeMarkefors View Post
    Meanwhile, elsewhere on the internet:
    Let me know in 6 months.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #110  
    Let's not oversimplify things.
    Sensor size is one factor which FX9 and C500mk share. Different approaches and priorities and customer needs differ.

    FX9 = better shoulder style shooting, needs rigging for Raw, superior 16 bit Raw
    C500mk2 = more compact, more suitable for gimbals, needs rigging for shoulder shooting, has on-board raw
    Analog > Apollo wooden handgrip http://omeneo.com
    Digital > Primers - professional image transformation tools http://omeneo.com/primers

    imdb


    "Como delfines en el fondo del oceano
    volamos por el universo incentivados por la esperanza"

    "L'esperanza", Sven Všth
    "It's a poor sort of memory that only works backwards"
    Jung/ Carol
    Reply With Quote  
     

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts