|
Great post as always Phil.
I'm really looking forward to where DSMC3 will take us.
Here, I placed an order for the ST Komodo and it was mind blowing how it could match Helium , Monstro and Gemini footage. There were places it was obviously inferior, but it interacted well, and the global shutter and form factor really opened lots of creative possibilities in a big project.
The Komodo impressed so much that at least , from what I know of, 10 of the biggest local production houses have purchased or ordered one. There are TV Commercial Production houses that are switching from Arri to Red because of how impressed they were with Komodo. Its crazy. Red really hit a homer with it.
I'm hoping DSMC3 provides us an option of going modular or Ranger like- two different bodies- ike they are now. The DSMC2 form factor is one of the attributes I like most of my Monstro due to its versatility. As for the internal ND's, Kipertie proved this works and the only reason I still didn't go for it is that I really like my main hardware components to be first party. Its something I stick to since my early camera purchases and has never failed me.
Global Shutter, Higher 8K frame rates ( the bottleneck now is due to media speed and cpu, modern advancements could very well brake this barrier, no?) the same Dynamic Range (seriously is there more dynamic range needed than what we have on Monstro?) and even better color and I'm all set.
Being a Carbon Fibre DSMC2 Owner I would hope for a Carbon DSMC3 but heard Red sold all their Carbon making gear. I love the extra few gains in lightweight as well as the texture of it.
Anyways, challenging times, but still, people demand more and more content, which is somehow reassuring for those of us doing a living with this.
Would love for Vertical Shooting to be a criminal offence, but more and more deliveries are going for this format. I remember RED made a fantastic DSMC Vertical and Horizontal Head. Would love for RED to remake this... Maybe GDU @Jarred Land?
Stay safe everyone. Keep creating!
Have to say I agree with the opening post. And now face masks with skulls on them? This is definitely not a highlight for RED.
I guess you have to laugh, I mean really...?!
https://www.red.com/red-face-masks-p...ntity=1?size=1
It's been years since I've shot or tested the F55, but testing methods haven't changed. Let me see if there's one laying around in town I guess. It sat around ~14 stops max. With the ways people measure things these days who knows, that might be 11. But I'd say 14 was a good number if you're looking for one.
If there was any validity to testing every camera to date that's still being used somewhere it would be fun to blow a few weeks grabbing all the DR, color response, etc stuff all at once. Short of a consistent shadow box and controlled cave for DR tests it's tricky to maintain consistency for real world tests over the years.
Got a decent round of camera tests coming up for a project mid-year, but I doubt highly the F55 will be in the mix.
I could care less about the skulls - the concerning part is people are buying and using these type of masks routinely. The original idea of not wearing masks in the early days and then cloth masks was that there were not enough n95 masks available even for the front line first responders and medical people to protect themselves and they didn't want the average Joe buying up the small supply.
With the massive levels of infection around the country (and particularly the LA area) people should be using n95 level masks whenever possible.
Cloth masks do little to prevent the spread of the aerosol virus, as the virus is too small. Cloth masks help a little bit because they stop actual spittle and such and they shorten the distance your breath (and therefore the aerosol virus) travels but overall doesn't really protect the wearer or others particularly well.
Half my family are firefighter/paramedics and the other half are medical workers and I can tell you this virus/pandemic sucks (daughter's 34 yo boyfriend has been hospitalized since Christmas and on ventilator for almost 2 weeks with not great chance of survival and certainly heavily damaged lungs and organs if survives)
It's not just the 400,000 deaths, it's the several million survivors that will have serious health issues the rest of their lives.
my suggestion is buy the $35 skull mask and hang it next to your RED hat as a cute souvenir and then buy some N95s to actually use.
PSA over.
Fair point Michael, I agree.
Personally I think the cameras visually looks great, but I do not like names like "weapon" and I dislike the skull. When we got our second Helium I showed it to a female cinematographer and she did not react well over the skull. Some of the names I think are great are: Geimini, Monstro, Dragon. I think the cameras look great otherwise, maybe they could bring in more ideas from Space. I want DSMC3 SATURN!
I think the other manufacturers have improved a lot but for wildlife Red is still the best for what we film. The resolution is great, it is great to have 60fps in 8K, the codec is brilliant. Red has so many features that are really awesome when you need it like HDRx, pre record is also great which is something not all other cameras has.
Still plenty of things that can be improved in the future:
- Make it possible to verify focus. To verify 8K focus on a flying bird on a 2k screen is very hard. A small zoomed window would be great.
- Less loud fan. Causes so much problems when recording audio at the same time
- Better audio inputs
- Faster Interface.
- The shadows have a bit greenish tint on Helium that is a bit tricky to get rid of
- Redundancy with media. I want to have 2 disks written to at all times
- Being able to delete takes, and trim clips in camera. I can with Canon and Phantom, so hope Red will let us do this too.
- Less power hungry
- Internal ND would be great, but we use the Revolva filters which are great so not really missing it that much.
- More slow motion
Looking forward to when we can film more again, but plenty to edit in the meantime!
« Previous Thread | Next Thread » |