|
|
Arguing about 24p or 30p is pointless, just go and check clips 5D is producing.
My cable HDTV that is 3 times compressed on top of compression is much better.
When picture is static on 5D, it is not bad, but as soon as there is any movement, the resolution drops to 16 pixels per sq inch or so. I think it is the choice of codec, low end MPG4 format. Any better codec will blew up the CPU on 5D I guess.
can't wait to get that new sensor in our red !
Nothing can do with 1080p with 30fps, yaa ofcourse u can shot some home functions etc thats al (only for personal usage) infact its absolutely useless for indifilm makers...
might this be what u asked for
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O8ILR7uf4GM
looks like skew to me
(edit, already posted http://www.reduser.net/forum/showthread.php?t=19160)
I cannot believe that some people can see an original movie quality through the heavy youtube compression.
Very strange.
Or could be that some of them are fans of the other brand...
Also could be that I'm a blind :) :help: .


Canon has some HD 5D demo clips on the jp website.
They use HD flash to play it, well maybe Adobe HD flash is totaly compressed than, but I didn't see such bad compression on Adobe website HD 1080 flash demos.
Compare HD flash demos from Adobe website and Canon 5D demos on jp website.
Day and night difference.
Maybe Adobe demo was done from RED 4K source:-)
Jim is promising higher framerates as well as higher resolution for his DSMC camera so it seems that his camera would be the logical choice.
As long as Intel, Seagate, etc. continue to advance computer technology, I see no reason for RED to slow down. If you can't afford additional computer gear (even as prices drop precipitously), then just downsample the original material to something you can handle.
You can always get better "image quality" in lower resolutions by just resampling the larger resolutions in post. It adds a delay to your post-production, but it's the only way to let the rest of us (with faster, newer gear) get the benefit of RED's new tech.
For dynamic range, yes, we'd all like to see an improvement there. However, increasing resolution has proven to be a good way to increase dynamic range. Not at the pixel level, where uninformed product reviews are done, but at the image level, where the differences actually matter. (Due to the fact that noise adds in quadrature, read noise tends to scale with pixel size, and Agranov's Law.)
I'm looking forward to when all the high tech has trickled down from digicams to DSLR cameras. Quantum efficiency, read noise, resolution, etc. are all many times better in 1/1.7" sensors (per area). QE is starting to catch up now that DSLR cameras are finally getting gapless microlenses (although not on the 5Dm2 yet).
Daniel, You clearly have not worked with Red One yet, at least not on a prolongate basis... I do happen to have the latest Apple gear and actual 4x4Gb fiber-optic storage, but this is not about what You can afford. That is a very lame justification...
Just look at Apple and the OS-X. Sure You could keep bringing in ever more features and the "latest" gear handles the OS without a problem. But even they woke up and realize that the code is quite unnecessarily heavy and in need of optimization. This is why Snow Leopard (10.6) is focusing primarily on OS optimization and code streamlining, instead of packing in another ton of features...
Also note that I have clearly said "also" when referring to their focus. In no way I am trying to say that what ever plans have been announced are useless or futile... As soon as Epic is out we will trade-in our Red One and I am pretty sure I will be getting the DSMC as soon as it is out as well... Jim & his team is absolutely correct in pushing further the image resolution and quality...
What I am trying to say is that for vast majority of future RED owners even Red One is overkill when it comes to resolution. And I am not talking about the current Red One owners (maybe few) - as they/we are very much after the higher-end workflows. I am talking about all the Scarlet users who will outnumber Red One at least 10:1 within the first year...
While we have several projects that do benefit from the higher resolutions, majority of our project will go through 2K DI. Sure You get a great image downscaling the 4K to 2K, but a the cost of huge storage requirements for both online and off-line (backup). You can fill a 1TB in a week of shooting quite easily, in our case even faster as we shoot stereo with two Red Ones...
Problem with Red One is that to go down to 3K You loose Your wide angles due to sensor crop. Especially for independent feature film projects on tighter budgets you will benefit from being able to shoot 3K. And the storage requirement is not 25% less as it would seem on the first glance. We are talking almost 50% reduction for storage, time required to handle the data, backup and of course image processing to name a few focus points in one's workflow...
There is definitely market for ~3K-RAW camera with Mysterium X / Monstro at S35 size with interchangeable lens mounts. It will fill the gap between Scarlet and Red One and it will nicely compliment Scarlet-based projects...
This is why I have said I would like to see the RED sensor program ALSO focused on higher DR and image quality in the lower resolutions - specifically the same 3K resolution Scarlet is going to have. This way You would not need to develop any new EPB's and associated electronics...
Rant Off... :)
| « Previous Thread | Next Thread » |