I just want to say at the outset: yes, I have tried searching the forum to see if this has already been addressed. So if it has, I would very much appreciate being re-directed.
My question is: has anyone done a comparison test of the various Resample filter algorithms available in Red rushes - eg. Cubic, Mitchell, Gauss, Quadratic etc. etc. - and posted their results ie. some screencaps? Any sort of general, 'in my opinion, this filter is more suited for blah blah blah type footage'....?
Whilst I know many people will have a particular algorithm they always favour, I'm assuming none are necessarily 'better' than another, merely a matter of taste and/or what suits the particular material being transcoded. Otherwise why would Red rushes offer so many different ones? (I'm also assuming it's not because some are faster to transcode than others, because the various debayering options are far more relevant to speed issues).
I know I could also do the comparison myself, and I might when I get the time. But I was just wondering if anyone has done some real comprehensive tests that might be of value to others. Cos that'd be frickin awesome.