Why not blue-ray in red-ray instead DVD-9 ?

[Milan Nikolic]

It would be advancement cosidering capacity and future of the media. Just my two dinars! :umm:

[Evan Meades]

yeah makes sense!

[Stuart English]

Because when you apply our compression technology, a Blu-Ray disk drive isn't necessary....

[Pawel Achtel]

Cost.

[Charles Angus]

But you could fit 5 times the content onto a Blu-ray, at the same quality...

[Graeme Nattress]

Think format agnostic, rather than tied to a particular physical media. And what Stuart says...

Graeme

[Jonas Rejman]

Why an optical media in the first place?

Of all RED bleeding-edge advancements, this seems rather antiquate to me.

Won't we deliver over internet anyway?
Aren't 2.5' drives/flashdrives reusable and more economic and (almost) smaller in size?

What do I miss here?

[Steven Caesare]

I suspect format agnostic is exactly what Red has in mind...

[Graeme Nattress]

I'm agnostic about format agnosticism.

Graeme

[Noah Kadner]

SDHC baby- cheap and plentiful. :)

-Noah