It would be advancement cosidering capacity and future of the media. Just my two dinars! :umm:
|
|
11-01-2008, 12:23 PM
It would be advancement cosidering capacity and future of the media. Just my two dinars! :umm:
05-27-2009, 05:28 PM
yeah makes sense!
#3
Red ray
05-27-2009, 06:20 PM
Because when you apply our compression technology, a Blu-Ray disk drive isn't necessary....
05-27-2009, 06:27 PM
Cost.
06-19-2009, 09:22 AM
but you could lower the compression factor to give another boost to the picture quality, or am I missing something here? Not yet used to the RED workflow, 'cause not owning one ..... desperately waiting for the SCARLETOriginally Posted by Stuart English
06-19-2009, 09:41 AM
Maybe someone who was there could comment, but the previously posted comments from the RED party at NAB was the people could not tell the difference between uncompressed 4k playback and 4k from the Red Ray codec running at normal DV data rates. If this is the case, Red Ray is a revolutionary breakthrough in video compression technology.but you could lower the compression factor to give another boost to the picture quality, or am I missing something here? Not yet used to the RED workflow, 'cause not owning one ..... desperately waiting for the SCARLET
06-20-2009, 07:44 AM
Thank you David, couldn't attend the RED party - quite a long way from Europeso it's all about seeing (or not seeing) - forget the measurements or compression facts .......
05-27-2009, 06:29 PM
But you could fit 5 times the content onto a Blu-ray, at the same quality...
05-27-2009, 06:46 PM
Think format agnostic, rather than tied to a particular physical media. And what Stuart says...
Graeme
05-27-2009, 10:53 PM
Why an optical media in the first place?
Of all RED bleeding-edge advancements, this seems rather antiquate to me.
Won't we deliver over internet anyway?
Aren't 2.5' drives/flashdrives reusable and more economic and (almost) smaller in size?
What do I miss here?
| « Previous Thread | Next Thread » |
