Click here to go to the first RED TEAM post in this thread.   Thread: Why not blue-ray in red-ray instead DVD-9 ?

Reply to Thread
Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst 12345
Results 41 to 42 of 42
  1. #41  
    Senior Member Gerald Menclik's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Vienna, Austria
    Posts
    240
    Quote Originally Posted by David Rasberry View Post
    Maybe someone who was there could comment, but the previously posted comments from the RED party at NAB was the people could not tell the difference between uncompressed 4k playback and 4k from the Red Ray codec running at normal DV data rates. If this is the case, Red Ray is a revolutionary breakthrough in video compression technology.
    Thank you David, couldn't attend the RED party - quite a long way from Europe so it's all about seeing (or not seeing) - forget the measurements or compression facts .......
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #42  
    "The only thing that Sony has done is driven up the price for consumers and they can't even claim that they did so and made a profit out of it. At this point, Sony is a cancerous growth in multiple industries and major parts of it need to be removed."

    That's funny.

    I don't have BluRay, have no plans to ever invest any money in it. I also wasn't impressed by the compression on the several samples I saw (designed specifically to sell the thing).

    I'm more than happy to see what else comes along...

    ...like Red Ray. Hey, back on topic!
    Reply With Quote  
     

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts