Thread: The New World

Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 16 of 16
  1. #11  
    Senior Member Radoslav Karapetkov's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Sofia, Bulgaria [EU]
    Posts
    2,408
    Quote Originally Posted by number6 View Post
    My concern is not about the immediate future, but a hundred years from now. If Jannard is not here at that time, who's gonna build my "new idea" camera then?!

    That's what keeps ME up at night.

    I think you know something we don't. :)
    EveryOne is the One...
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #12  
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    1,501
    Quote Originally Posted by karapetkov View Post
    I think you know something we don't. :)
    yes... I do.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #13  
    Senior Member Drew Suppa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Burbank, CA
    Posts
    140
    Quote Originally Posted by karapetkov View Post
    Jannard is the Columbus of digital cinema.
    Not a good analogy; the Vikings landed in North America in 1100CE and before them the Mayans were so aware of the geography of the world that their wise men sailed to the Indian coast and studied Buddhism with Tibetan sages... and who can forget the Asians who crossed to Alaska on a land bridge in the Bering Strait during the last Ice Age 12,000 years ago.

    Sorry... huge history buff.

    It's kind of like saying Bill Gates invented computers. He just stole a lot of technology from other people and assembled it in new and amazing ways.

    ...Maybe it is a good analogy, on second thought, no offense to Jannard.
    Drew Suppa
    S.O.C. Pending
    Cinematographer, Operator, 1st AC, DIT
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #14  
    Senior Member nick allsop's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    London
    Posts
    249
    i am concerned about no PL mount above 5K. there are professional work flows for 2/3" lenses and PL mount lenses. i see the 9k to be like 65mm and the 28k to possibly be like imax, i see them as sfx and specialist cameras. but am not sure about 6k FF35. the lenses seem to be AF stills lenses. i know people have been shooting red footage with stills lenses, but it seems that the more expensive higher resolution camera will be using cheaper and less proven glass.
    i'm concerned that there is now too much choice its all gonna get confusing.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #15  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    287
    PL mounts now available, but don't wish full resolution on top of it!
    Johann
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #16  
    Senior Member Radoslav Karapetkov's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Sofia, Bulgaria [EU]
    Posts
    2,408
    Quote Originally Posted by Suppatime View Post
    the Vikings

    There was the DVX100, ya know. 24p and stuff.

    the Mayans were so aware of the geography

    And the HVX200. :)

    And Kodak got these thingies from a loooong time, but they weren't available and certainly not affordable.

    Ya know? :bleh:


    Sorry... huge history buff.

    You're forgiven.

    And welcome to the club. ;)


    It's kind of like saying Bill Gates invented computers.

    M-no, a Bulgarian-American did.


    P.S. And Columbus was one lucky fuck! He was looking for India, for Christ's sake. Fortune favors the bold...

    P.S. (nosey) Ya know? ::bleh:
    EveryOne is the One...
    Reply With Quote  
     

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts