RED One vs. Scarlet S35

[Jaime Vallés]

I'm talking $15k, with no batteries, no lenses, no recording device, ect.; just modules. So you'll end up spending 15,000 in the Scarlet body and Modules.

I seriously doubt that adding an I/O module, controller module, CF card module and lens mount module (to make it equal to the RED-ONE without "accessories") would add another $8,000 to the price.

I think it's fair to say that the 5K S35 Scarlet brain plus the necessary modules will add up to somewhere around $10,000. That's still much cheaper than the RED-ONE body.

[Jason Ing]

This was just posted by Jim:

The "electronic engines" are different between each of these camera models. That means there are format capability differences. For example, the RED ONE has 4K, 3K, 2K, 1080P (soon) and anamorphic format options. It does ramping, time-lapse, has 4 channel 24-bit audio, etc. Scarlet will NOT have the full flexibility of a RED ONE. EPIC has more capability and flexibility than the other two. It is one of the reasons that the Scarlet body is smaller than an EPIC.

Just so you can figure that into your planning.

Scarlet will have limited format options.

RED ONE has many format options.

EPIC has virtually unlimited format options.

[Jannard]

http://www.reduser.net/forum/showthread.php?t=21946

[Jason Ing]

Looks like Jim and I are doing the same thing.

Except he has that fancy Avatar that makes his post more official.