Click here to go to the first RED TEAM post in this thread.   Thread: What about AUDIO?

Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 7 of 7

Hybrid View

  1. #1 What about AUDIO? 
    Senior Member Justin Kirchhoff's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Posts
    1,519
    I don't ask questions much, as I like to do all my research scoping the threads, but recently I have thought of a question that may be legit and not have been asked yet?

    I remember watching the interview with Ted and Mike Curtis talking about how much record time the RED Drive gets....around 3 hours.

    Well, in a recent post by Jim, he said that there is roughly 2 hours of record time on the RED Drive.

    So, what I'm guessing is the discrepancy with footage shot without audio (3 hours of record time) vs. footage shot WITH audio (2 hours of record time).

    This is just a hypothetical guess, but I would love to know what and if the audio does take up that much data on the RED Drive, or if it really is all that relevant with the image capture data rate? Any answer would be helpful!

    Thanks guy.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    275
    Interesting question.

    I also wonder if the audio is embedded in the redcode file? I assume it is, but you never know I guess.

    Tim
    The only person who could miss with this gun is the sucker with the bread to buy it. - Dawn of the Dead
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3.   Click here to go to the next RED TEAM post in this thread.
  #3  
    The difference is because we haven't fully nailed down compression levels and such. It's probably going to be somewhere in between 2 - 3 hours (4K @ 24 fps) *without* audio.

    Audio is embedded indeed.
    ROBCODE Santa Claus @ RED

    "You get the chicken by waiting for the egg to hatch, not by smashing it with a hammer" - Jarred
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4  
    Senior Member Justin Kirchhoff's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Posts
    1,519
    Quote Originally Posted by Rob Lohman View Post
    The difference is because we haven't fully nailed down compression levels and such. It's probably going to be somewhere in between 2 - 3 hours (4K @ 24 fps) *without* audio.

    Audio is embedded indeed.
    Thanks Rob for clearing that up. That's good news, at least for me! You guys make me happy every time I get information...
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5  
    That's interesting: that means that the recorded datastream for REDCODE 4K@24fps will be between 33 and 50 MB/s.

    That is good news IMO since the spec of 27MB/s might be a bit low compared to other RAW wavelet codecs such as Cineform's.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6  
    24 bits x 48000 samples/sec = 1152000 bits/sec, or 141 KB/sec. Four channels would be 564 KB/sec.

    Not going to make much difference.
    You should follow me on Twitter here.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7.   This is the last RED TEAM post in this thread.   #7 Audio 
    Red Team Stuart English's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Irvine, Ca
    Posts
    3,642
    You got it right Chris - relative to the video data rate audio is trivial.

    The hours per mag discrepancy is just that the codec's AVERAGE and PEAK data rates are still being tweaked. In addition, some comments fall on the conversative side of that equation, some comments reflect the assumption its 27MB/s as per our IBC estimate.

    Unlike tape decks that have a requirement of a fixed data rate, we have a lot of flexibility in using constant or variable bit rates and / or higher bit rates as may be most appropriate to the task at hand.

    More later ...
    Workflow Wizard
    Reply With Quote  
     

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts