Thread: rehousing still lenses..

Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11
  1. #1 rehousing still lenses.. 
    Senior Member Roberto B's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    1,787
    it seems they're optically good.. even mr david mullen himself agrees.. so why not?

    evin, you one of my idols here.. maybe you might have the skills to take the task.. i believe it would go quite well.. :greedy:

    what do you guys think?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2  
    Senior Member Stephen Williams's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    3,880
    Quote Originally Posted by filmmaker's gang View Post
    it seems they're optically good.. even mr david mullen himself agrees.. so why not?

    evin, you one of my idols here.. maybe you might have the skills to take the task.. i believe it would go quite well.. :greedy:

    what do you guys think?
    Hi,

    Problem is they will be expensive & will still breathe due to their design.

    Stephen
    Epic M owner
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3  
    Senior Member Roberto B's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    1,787
    thank you stephen for your contribution.. isn't it possible to hold the breathing problem?.. the idea would be to fix such kind of still stuff problems..

    note: i will post a poll.. do not take that poll so much seriously.. even i'd like to find a way cheaper to go safer with non expensive glass.. i've been reading all the inputs from the motion picture crew people (so much appreciated.. even you finner.. thank you all)
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4  
    I'm a shooter, not an engineer. I'll leave that to the Red team, P+S, century and others. I might however try and come up with a geared down follow focus ala the Willy tech. Something that would give the Nikkors the correct focus direction and precision needed. Emphasis on
    MIGHT, I do still want to shoot with my Red.
    "All art is deception."

    My DP reel...
    http://www.evingrantdp.com
    http://www.YouTube.com/evingrant
    360º Cinematography and camera rigs...
    http://www.360dop.com
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5  
    Senior Member Roberto B's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    1,787
    i understand you.. but isn't there anyone with guts for to go with?

    i read that your warning to peter and i agree with you, so..

    any suggestion about honest and skilled people interested to buy the task?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6  
    Senior Member Stephen Williams's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    3,880
    Quote Originally Posted by filmmaker's gang View Post
    thank you stephen for your contribution.. isn't it possible to hold the breathing problem?.. the idea would be to fix such kind of still stuff problems..
    Hi,

    Generally the Canon primes did breathe more than lenses such as the SuperSpeeds that were designed from scratch for motion picture work. I think it's due to how the lens focuses, if a lens moves backwards & forwards to focus then it will breathe.

    Stephen
    Epic M owner
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #7  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    1,684
    Just wanted to be sure... "breathe" means that it continues to move slightly even though you've stopped focusing?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #8  
    cross-examiner Emanuel A.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    2,258
    Similar zoom in or out when you're doing the focus. Just so simple than this. But that slightly move can be present yes if your lens is not manufactured for motion picture use. That's the case of the still lenses.
    RED ONE @home
    Donald Duck #111
    Emanuel & Co's RED ONE
    Scrooge McDuck
    #647

    RED ZOOM LENSES
    #156
    #157

    RED 300mm LENS
    #82
    Who am I?
    LINK
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #9  
    Senior Member sbaechler's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Zürich
    Posts
    206
    Quote Originally Posted by filmmaker's gang View Post
    it seems they're optically good.. even mr david mullen himself agrees.. so why not?

    evin, you one of my idols here.. maybe you might have the skills to take the task.. i believe it would go quite well.. :greedy:

    what do you guys think?
    The lens tech at Megarent, Switzerland converted the Nikkor 17-35 into a PL-Mount cinema lens. It works fine and it's a very popular zoom now. Only the focus rotation is a bit short for a cinema lens.
    It took him almost a year to do it. But if there are enough people interested maybe he will convert a small series.
    Contact camera@megarent.com.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #10  
    Senior Member Sanjin Jukic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Vienna, Austria
    Posts
    8,710
    MEGARENT:

    17-35 Nikon LW T 2,8 - 22
    Daily CHF 350.–
    Weekly CHF 1'050.–

    From Megarent rental catalogue , page 18.
    Download at
    http://www.megarent.com/pub/Preisliste-2006-www.pdf
    "There is no point in having sharp images when you've fuzzy ideas."
    Jean-Luc Godard.

    Dynamic range is, after all, the measurement between well saturation (photosite blowout) and noise floor.
    Thom Hogan


    --------

    500px >>>
    Twitter >>>
    Facebook >>>
    Vimeo >>>
    Reply With Quote  
     

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts