Thread: One fear...

Reply to Thread
Page 12 of 12 FirstFirst ... 289101112
Results 111 to 113 of 113
  1. #111  
    Senior Member Kyle Mallory's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Salt Lake City
    Posts
    617
    Quote Originally Posted by Brook Willard View Post
    Dino's right. Hell, my DIT cart alone would have a $40,000 replacement cost if it went away tomorrow. He and I are probably the guys who deal with some of the largest clients in LA... fast shoots need instant turnaround and big clients like big toys. :)
    Brook

    Just following this thread, and thought I would chime in my .02 worth. I think you have a valid concern about the various models canabolizing the market, but I also think as someone pointed out, that it won't be all that bad.

    75% of all projects will need a Sc FF35. A Sc FF35 rental might be 200$/day.
    15% of all projects will need a Ep S35. An Ep S35 rental might be $500/day.
    8% of all projects will need a Ep F35. An Ep F35 rental might be $1200/day.
    2% of all project will need an Ep 645. An Ep 645 rental might be $3000/day (maybe even upwards of $4k/day?).

    The factor of which projects will need which camera is based on the differences of the camera. The point is, the more niche that a camera fulfills (a smaller piece of the pie) people will be willing to pay an exponentially higher rental rate for the capabilities of that camera. I'm just speculating on the rental rates, but if a project deems a need for a 645, and there is only 2 in a thousand mile radius, and the going rate for both of those cameras is $5000/day, without any weekly discounts, etc. and that is what the 2% of the project requires.. they projects that can afford it, will.

    I think its a mistake to think (fyi, you are correct in /your/ thinking) that just because the 645 can shoot S35, that people will be willing to pay for a 645 at $3k/day over an Sc F35. It doesn't make sense for the producer/DP.

    I'm considering buying the Ep F35, taking this model into account. After reading through this thread, I think I'll buy an Sc S35 because at the price point, its a trival "add-on".

    I send my R1 out about once every 3 weeks, on average for two to three days (a 3:20 ratio). No a super strong rental market in Utah, bit it pays for itself. Going to the Ep, I hope will give me a niche that will probably kill my rental frequency to 1:30, but will also give me higher-end clients who are willing to pay a premium for the extra lattitude, frame rate, etc.

    I also think that the quality of service, and in particular, the span of services that you offer will also play a role. Ie, you DI cart. Sure, you can rent a Sc F35 for $200/day (and nothing else), and for some productions that is fine. But again, discriminating clients would rather pay $1200/day for a Sc F35 knowing that they get a top-rate DIT and his cart for onset dailies, color management, data processing and archival.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #112  
    Quote Originally Posted by Brook Willard View Post
    It's not so much the lowering of the cost of equipment and the increase in owner/operators that concerns me. It's that a $7,000 camera and a $43,000 camera do the exact same thing for a lot of productions.
    I think you are right Brook. But the extra dynamic range of the Monstro chip and electronics will be worth money to a client who cares about the image. How much money will vary from client to client I suppose.. but that is an advantage of Epic or Scarlet FF over older and cheaper RED cameras.
    I'd love to buy a 645 myself, but I can't imagine many clients actually wanting me to film in medium format. I'm going to get a FF35 Scarlet because it has the better dynamic range and I want it to replace my 5D, but the vast majority of paying clients aren't going to care about more that 4K S35 for the next few years I don't think. I mean how many people even get to film-out @ 2K?
    However if we are serious about taking stills or a new "stills-like" motion picture format (meaning a new art form that RED is making possible), then 645 or 617 are suddenly very attractive I think. If I had the money I would buy a 645, but I don't think it would be a business investment unless I could carve a little niche for myself..
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #113  
    Quote Originally Posted by Evin Grant View Post
    There are two different approaches here, both are legit. Brook's and Dino's is a specific need, I get by fine with a Macbook Pro and a UPS on a $200 rock-n-roller cart.
    Agreed. Depending on the job and the client, you may need more or you may need less. Best to be prepared for large jobs, but there is such a thing as too much for the smaller ones. One size doesn't necessarily fit all.

    And for the record, everyone that I've come across that has worked with Dino, always speaks very highly of him.

    -CJ
    Reply With Quote  
     

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts