Click here to go to the first RED TEAM post in this thread.   Thread: ProRes422, no 1080p???

Reply to Thread
Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ... 23456
Results 51 to 52 of 52
  1.   This is the last RED TEAM post in this thread.   #51  
    Sure you could write as 4:1.33 etc. So yes, it's a slightly higer chroma rate than DV's 4:1:1, but to declare it better, is like saying bad is slightly better than worse :-) 4:2:0 is fine for progressive, but horrible for interlace. Depends with which you're comparing.

    Graeme
    www.red.com - 5k Digital Cinema Camera
    Science enables stories. Stories drive science
    FLUT™, Image Processing, Colour Science and Demosaic Algorithms, REDRAY 4K delivery
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #52  
    Senior Member Anders Holck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    1,316
    And if you think about it, 3:1:1 in 1440x1080 is actually pretty much equal to the chroma resolution of a 4:1:1 1920x1080 signal, when you compare the Chroma channels of the original HD-SDI input.
    with the HD-SDI output.
    I believe this was the reason Sony settled on 3:1:1 in the first place. 3x1.333333333 is very close to 4.
    So the input subsampler would do a 1.3333333:1 reduction on the Y channel, and a a 2:1 reduction on the Chroma channels.
    Facebook Skype: aholck
    Reply With Quote  
     

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts