Thread: Dell 4K Displays

Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 32
  1. #1 Dell 4K Displays 
    Hey, I just saw this posted on another forum. Thought I'd share it over here.

    http://www.gearlog.com/2007/05/dell_...slim_displ.php

    Up to 4K, only half an inch thick, and available later this year. Not too shabby.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2  
    cross-examiner Emanuel A.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    2,262
    Nice info.

    BTW, check your PM box please.

    EDIT -- Thanks for your PM. Much appreciated.
    RED ONE @home
    Donald Duck #111
    Emanuel & Co's RED ONE
    Scrooge McDuck
    #647

    RED ZOOM LENSES
    #156
    #157

    RED 300mm LENS
    #82
    Who am I?
    LINK
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3  
    Now that looks like a next-gen display.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4  
    Moderator Tom Lowe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    somewhere worshiping Terrence Malick
    Posts
    8,211
    Where does it say 4K?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    1,682
    Quote Originally Posted by Tom View Post
    Where does it say 4K?
    It says "up to 4x the current HDTV resolutions". Whatever that means... :unsure:
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6  
    Quote Originally Posted by parisrem View Post
    Hey, I just saw this posted on another forum. Thought I'd share it over here.

    http://www.gearlog.com/2007/05/dell_...slim_displ.php

    Up to 4K, only half an inch thick, and available later this year. Not too shabby.
    If Dell is coming out with a 4k capable monitor, Apple is probably going to do so very soon, but details are probably heavily embargoed.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #7  
    That looks sweet, though I don't think (As Tom indicates) it'll be 4k. They say four times HDTV, so...

    If it's 4 x 720p then that'd be 3686400 pixels, about a third of 4k 16:9 (9434880 pixels)

    If it's 4 x 1080p then that'd be 8294400 so just shy of that elusive 4k mark: 3840x2160

    I think my maths is correct, feel free to check over it and put me in my place if I'm wrong.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #8  
    Moderator Tom Lowe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    somewhere worshiping Terrence Malick
    Posts
    8,211
    hmmm... so 1080 x 4 is roughly 4K? i thought it was like 6 x times more or something like that for 4K, but i won't attempt the math.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #9  
    Junior Member maximose's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    7
    I'm not real knowledgeable in this area, but it seems 4k in your face would be over kill. Wouldn't you need a larger surface area to really notice the fine detail?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #10  
    Quote Originally Posted by maximose View Post
    I'm not real knowledgeable in this area, but it seems 4k in your face would be over kill. Wouldn't you need a larger surface area to really notice the fine detail?
    It all comes down to how much of your field of view the image fills, which is, of course, determined both by how big the screen is and how far away you are.

    As a general rule you need to sit within about two screen heights to see the resolution of 4K. With a 30" 16:9 screen, that means about two feet. That's not an unreasonably close distance for a computer screen.
    You should follow me on Twitter here.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts