Click here to go to the first RED TEAM post in this thread.   Thread: help with audio meters

Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1 help with audio meters 
    2 questions....

    1. I haven't been able to get a definitive answer on what the marks on the meters correspond to. Is the embolden line in build 17 -12dBU? It is obviously different from the great whitepaper sounddevices released for earlier builds.

    2. on a shoot yesterday and the meters would intermittently appear to clip. this was during normal dialog that we weren't pushing hard at all on the meters. periodically both meters would turn entirely red for a split second. the playback was fine with no clipping. we were backing up to a separate audio harddrive recorder but still...

    any thoughts or similar experiences?

    Michael
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2  
    Member Mike Burke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Farmington Hills, Mich.
    Posts
    56
    Quote Originally Posted by mrand View Post
    2 questions....

    1. I haven't been able to get a definitive answer on what the marks on the meters correspond to. Is the embolden line in build 17 -12dBU? It is obviously different from the great whitepaper sounddevices released for earlier builds.

    2. on a shoot yesterday and the meters would intermittently appear to clip. this was during normal dialog that we weren't pushing hard at all on the meters. periodically both meters would turn entirely red for a split second. the playback was fine with no clipping. we were backing up to a separate audio harddrive recorder but still...

    any thoughts or similar experiences?

    Michael
    The embolden line is meant to represent -20dbfs.
    It sounds as though you're experiencing the same problem as we and a few others have.
    Check out this thread. http://205.234.135.241/forum/showthread.php?t=26140
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3  
    Story Teller Brian Ferguson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Irvine, CA
    Posts
    383
    If you send a real -20dBFS signal at line level from a Sound Devices Recorder (not mixer that is analog to analog) at line level it will hit the far right hash mark on the RED build 17 . I have also repeated these as standard signals in our lab.

    The -20 1k tone will record on camera and playback in FCP. The RED VU scale right now looks a bit to heavily weighted to the right. Once you know where a true -20dBFS is (the far right mark) there is a +20 headroom from there.
    Put it this way if you are not hitting the yellows on build 17 you are not hot enough. It might seem too far to the right on the scale but it is the proper place to be. Just saying.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    planetearth
    Posts
    756
    Quote Originally Posted by Brian Ferguson View Post
    If you send a real -20dBFS signal at line level from a Sound Devices Recorder (not mixer that is analog to analog) at line level it will hit the far right hash mark on the RED build 17 .
    What about from a mixer/analog to analog?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5.   Click here to go to the next RED TEAM post in this thread.
  #5 Audio 
    Red Team Stuart English's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Irvine, Ca
    Posts
    3,642
    What about from a mixer/analog to analog?
    Just make sure that a 1KHz tone also hits that right hash mark.
    Workflow Wizard
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    246
    There is an important distinction to make regarding dBU and dBFS. You cannot "send -20dBFS out of a mixer" at least not exactly. the dBFS scale is a digital scale that represents the mathematical clipping point of a digital signal. dBU is the electrical power output in relation to .7746v = 0dBU or dBV where 1v = 0dBV. dBU scale is more common in our field.

    Where you can convert between voltage peak to peak, voltage RMS, dBU, and dBV, there is no way that you can convert to/from dBFS... because this depends entirely on how the device in question is calibrated. It could be calibrated correctly to the European standard, it could be calibrated correctly to the American standard, or it could be calibrated (or not calibrated) to its own standard. This is where the whole calibration process comes into play. It is not correct to assume that matching up equipment will show levels at the expected values... it is assumed that once you have tone, you then adjust the recorder / camera / submixer to the right input sensitivity to match the calibration target of your choice. RED makes it a bit more difficult since it does not have graduated input sensitivity adjustments, as it really should, or if they are brave enough to not provide such adjustment (only coarse adjustment in the form of a -10dB pad), then at least they should precalibrate it to match up with the Sound Devices 302, probably the most ubiquitous mixer out there.

    It sounds like there is a defect in the board or installation process, though, by the accounts that some people are reporting where the input is overmodulating even though the RMS input levels are very low.

    By the way, any mixer is capable of outputting tone, just because it doesn't have it built in, doesn't mean that you can't plug in a cheap external tone generator.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7.   This is the last RED TEAM post in this thread.   #7 Audio Meter Levels 
    Red Team Stuart English's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Irvine, Ca
    Posts
    3,642
    If you send a 0dBU (-20dBFS) line output signal from a Sound Devices Recorder / Mixer it will hit the far right hash mark on Build 17
    The new beta Build 18 v3.6.4 has re-worked the audio meter sensitivity, see the Build 18 v3.6.4 Operations Guide for full details.

    In summary with REV B audio hardware a 0dBu / - 20dBFS line input signal should align to the single Reference Level mark.
    Workflow Wizard
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #8  
    What about Build 17, and still waiting for my number to be called for the hardware upgrade? What does the hash mark correspond to there?
    Reply With Quote  
     

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts