Thread: 8 Core 2.26 Mac Pro R3D processing

Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 21
  1. #1 8 Core 2.26 Mac Pro R3D processing 
    So, I'm sure there are tons of reports out there, but I just wanted to post my initial experience with the new 8 core 2.26 Core i7 based Mac Pros.


    They are fantastic!

    I was concerned about the price jump between just getting some used 8 core 2.8 GHZ penryn based mac pros, but, the new mac pro is everything you've hoped for (not quite, come on apple, give us independent FW800 busses and E-sata and two full size DL-DVI) for R3D processing. a stock 2.26 machine with absolutely no upgrades is processing footage from it's own internal drive back to it's own drive (ie, not optimal conditions, but it works for a quick test) at over 12 fps. Details below

    4k 2:1 RC 36 B17 with 1 scratch track of audio

    processed at a 1/2 Res normal (so 2k) debayer then scaled to 720p ProRes HQ, timecode and reel name burned in with 2 files being processed at once. Obviously things will speed up some when the new ram arrives and it's hooked to a RAID, but for a stock machine, this is pretty fantastic in my eyes. On the same footage I get around 7fps from a stock 8 core 2.8 ghz for reference. You could buy the 2.66 or 2.93, but depending on how many total machines you're getting, the 2.26 has a much higher performance/dollar for R3D processing than anything else (mac wise).
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2  
    Senior Member Roberto Lequeux's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    5,263
    171% then. But I guess you are limited by the drives so the question is how fast were your original drives and how fast are the new ones. Right?
    Writer - Director
    Crowing Lakes.com
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3  
    Awesome! Love to see some more comprehensive tests...
    Trevor Meier :: Story & Image
    http://trevormeier.com/
    http://storyspark.ca/

    Proud owner since R1 #182
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4  
    Senior Member jimhare's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Sydney Australia
    Posts
    3,601
    Oh Baby! Thanks Steve, that's the info I've been waiting for!

    Cheers,

    Jim
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5  
    how is Color playback at 2k r3d?
    Colorist
    Los Angeles
    www.lorenwhite.com
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Posts
    938
    We get about 9 frames/second using Clipfinder on 4K HD files using our Intel Quad with a big RAID via Fibre.

    Not sure that improvement is worth the money for us to upgrade yet. While that is nice, it still means overnights for every shoot to export...
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #7  
    Senior Member Roberto Lequeux's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    5,263
    He is getting 12fps off the internal single 7200rpm drive/s, these are not numbers that would tell you what you'd get with your "big RAID". I am really hoping to hear more once Steve gets a faster drive set up.
    Writer - Director
    Crowing Lakes.com
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #8  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Posts
    938
    Hmm...I'm not sure how much difference there would be...I've wondered myself and need to do some tests.

    We have 2 different RAIDs, 1 Apple 5 TB XRaid and 1 Infortrend 14TB RAID, both via Fibrea. I'll try and see the max fps we get in either of those or desktop scenario.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #9  
    Senior Member Tim Whitcomb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Portland, OR
    Posts
    3,449
    2.26 versus 2.93 is also substantial. wonder what the mac daddy does?

    FCP Studio 10th Anniversary Edition... Shipping Summer 2009 with Snow Leopard ??
    Kind regards,

    Tim Whitcomb
    Filmmaker
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #10  
    Senior Member Roberto Lequeux's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    5,263
    Especially when you are talking 16 cores. If FC 10th edition, or anything else, used all 16 cores effectively you'd have an additional 10.72 GHz at your disposal. But that remains to be seen.
    Writer - Director
    Crowing Lakes.com
    Reply With Quote  
     

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts