Click here to go to the first RED TEAM post in this thread.   Thread: Ask David Mullen ANYTHING

Reply to Thread
Page 305 of 481 FirstFirst ... 205255295301302303304305306307308309315355405 ... LastLast
Results 3,041 to 3,050 of 4803
  1. #3041  
    Flashing is just adding an overall layer of weak light to the film, like fogging it. It looks like what you'd think it looks like.

    When used in very low amounts on the negative, the loss of true black is not too noticeable because of the gamma of the print stock, etc. but it can lift low-level detail into greater visibility. The basic idea is that some information is on the threshold of visibility and just needs a bit more strength (or density on the negative) to cross that threshold. It is related to latensification, the notion that adding some weak overall light gives some barely-exposed silver halide grains enough photons to become developable into silver. Though flashing is more about lifting the blacks; more than a very weak amount (like a 7% flash) and you've gone beyond increasing shadow detail into merely milking the blacks and giving the impression of lower contrast. Flashing also softens color, plus reduces sharpness a bit because it reduces contrast, and contrast and sharpness are interconnected.

    There are films that were flashed mildly for a flashed look, and then films that were flashed but then printed using a silver retention process to restore the black, thus canceling the flashed look. The reason in this case for flashing was to counteract the increase in contrast that silver retention printing causes.

    "McCabe and Mrs. Miller" was flashed, as was "The Long Goodbye". "The Little Princess" was flashed about 10%.

    Then there are the movies that were flashed through the lens using a Lightflex or Varicon, such as some movies shot by Freddie Francis -- "Dune" for example. Often the flash was colored, imparting a tint to the shadows. "Dune" for example used different colors in the Lightflex for the different planet, mostly a brown flash for the desert planet scenes.

    The thing is that it's hard to show on a still frame because it's mainly about the black level, and I can't tell if the video transfer messed around with the black levels to get rid or, or reduce, the flash effect, and I can't know what the black levels are like on your computer monitor.

    If you look at the Blu-Ray frames here:
    http://www.dvdbeaver.com/film3/blu-r...ne_blu-ray.htm

    The image has mostly been corrected for normal blacks, but in a few frames probably some of the details in the black or dark green costumes are more visible due to the Lightflex flashing.

    This review of "The Long Goodbye" has some frames that show the flashed look of the movie:
    http://www.dvdbeaver.com/film/DVDRev...dvd_review.htm

    The DVD contains a reprint of the 1973 American Cinematographer article on the movie - it's a great article because it has strips of the movie print reprinted labelled by the amount of flashing used for each example.
    David Mullen, ASC
    Los Angeles
    http://www.davidmullenasc.com
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #3042  
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Jamaica W.I.
    Posts
    44
    Thanks David,
    I also want to ask if you shot the promo pieces for "Tara", and if you did how do you handle green screen so that the reflected green is minimized. I use back lighting from two or three positions to get a rim of light around the subject. When a moody look is required what do you suggest?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3043  
    I didn't shoot the promos for "Tara". Well, for moodier lighting, you can try just weak, soft backlighting to wash-out any green spill, but it helps to reduce the problem by backing the greenscreen as much as possible and using blacks around the sides off-camera to minimize the amount of green bouncing back at the subject.
    David Mullen, ASC
    Los Angeles
    http://www.davidmullenasc.com
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #3044  
    David hope you don't mind a non cinematography question:

    Recently I've been on some very high stress sets that have devolved into chaos.
    What do you feel are vital to the smooth running of a set and production.
    Quality AD's/Producers, de-stressing on set somehow etc. just generally looking to pick your mind on what makes a happy set run well.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #3045  
    The tone of the set is really set by the AD, DP, and Director since those three affect the nature of the work that has to be done that day and the amount of time allotted for it, etc. So any one of those three can also create a more stressful set by their attitude, their tone, their flexibility and organization, or lack of it.

    So I can be as calm and as prepared as I want, but if the director comes in screaming or is totally unprepared, he can create a level of stress that is hard to counteract.

    But certainly in a stressful environment, it's up to the individual to constantly ask himself or herself if they are contributing to the tension, or helping to work to deflate it.

    I'm a quiet person and I try to have a quiet set, and I try to know what I want for the set-up -- in detail -- once I've figured it all out after the blocking rehearsal, if not already in prep. That helps keep some level of tension down. A director who works with me, and vice-versa, to figure all of this in a professional manner, well, that helps.

    When things really go south, let's say the sun is dropping and now it's starting to rain, etc. then the key is to listen to your crew and understand their problems and give them reasonable instructions, not say "I don't care HOW windy it is, I need that 20'x20' silk up NOW!"

    But s--t rolls downhill and to some extent, I become the bringer of bad news as I convert the director's ideas into instructions for the crew under me.

    Humor helps.

    I try to maintain a sort of calm but focused energy on the set, keep things moving fast as a general basis (because you have to) so a little tension is a good thing probably, keeping people on their toes. The more you and your keys can think ahead and get a jump on something, the better it will be. But it's also about understanding your manpower limitations and not get overly clever trying to do several things at once.

    Thanking people at the end of a hard day (or any day) is a good habit, at least everyone knows nothing is personal and that we are all professionals here, and tomorrow hopefully will be better.

    Here's my bad habit: I have trouble learning names of people on the set because I meet them at a time when my mind is filled with thoughts of the day. So I'm running around trying to figure stuff out and someone says "I'm Frank the boom op" and I say hello but three hours later, I can't remember Frank's name. Not to mention that on the first day of shooting, you meet the grips & electricians as a group on the first set-up and it's hard to tell which is a grip and which is an electrician. All this to say that it takes me awhile to learn names, for which I apologize (if any of my crew is reading this...) Funny because I can remember the name of some DP who shot some minor movie sixty years ago... and what film stock it was shot on!
    David Mullen, ASC
    Los Angeles
    http://www.davidmullenasc.com
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #3046  
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Jamaica W.I.
    Posts
    44
    David, How do you feel about Directing and Photographing a project at the same time? Not necessarily a feature but also something short like a commercial.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #3047  
    Senior Member Luis Ortiz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    NJ-Serial#1321
    Posts
    270
    Mr. Mullen,

    Have you ever shot a fight scene and if so, how do you approach it? Do you use storyboards for coverage? Do you work closely with the fight choreographer (if he's called that)? Who really has the vision for what coverage is needed so it cuts well during editing? By cutting well I mean so the action doesn't look fake. Sorry if this has been answered in previous threads. Thank you in advance.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #3048  
    Quote Originally Posted by Gregory Lopez View Post
    David, How do you feel about Directing and Photographing a project at the same time? Not necessarily a feature but also something short like a commercial.
    Some people can do both well, some can only do one well. It's probably easier to do both on a commercial when you are following boards anyway, where it's not acting-intensive so you can spend more time behind the camera.

    Some actors resent directors who go off and deal with camera issues trying to do their own cinematography, while other actors like the fact that the director/DP is that close to them, shooting an intimate scene behind the camera.

    You just don't want it to turn into that "Jack of all trades, master of none" sort of situation where you do a mediocre job in two categories rather than do one job really well. But as I said, some directors have a talent for shooting their own material -- Soderbergh for example.
    David Mullen, ASC
    Los Angeles
    http://www.davidmullenasc.com
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #3049  
    Quote Originally Posted by Luis Ortiz View Post
    Mr. Mullen,

    Have you ever shot a fight scene and if so, how do you approach it? Do you use storyboards for coverage? Do you work closely with the fight choreographer (if he's called that)? Who really has the vision for what coverage is needed so it cuts well during editing? By cutting well I mean so the action doesn't look fake. Sorry if this has been answered in previous threads. Thank you in advance.
    Yes, it helps to storyboard a fight and even shoot rehearsals on video. A good fight choreographer / stunt coordinator is key. You basically tell him what the intent of the fight is stylistically, emotionally, and what you hope to do with the camera, even show some preliminary boards, and then have him go off with some stunt people and then the actors and work it out. Usually they come back with some videotape of the rehearsal so you can see how it is working for the camera. Then you make some adjustments, perhaps redesign the storyboards to match. And on the shooting day, you make further changes.

    There are standard tricks that you have to fall back on because you can't really have an actor making serious contact with their fists onto the other actor, except maybe in body areas that can be padded. Otherwise, you learn to line-up the camera so that the fake swing & hit "sells" for that angle, and you do it over and over again until it works, which is why you generally break-up a fight into three or so choreographed moves per angle, so you can quickly repeat them until you get it looking right. That gets harder and harder in longer takes where the actors have to get several moves right in one shot without a cut. Of course, if that's the style you've chosen, to minimize cuts and play it in one long take, then you need more rehearsal or actors better at doing stunts.

    Have you seen this Tony Ja fight scene that happens in one continuous take?
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yXIGP6_fNZk
    David Mullen, ASC
    Los Angeles
    http://www.davidmullenasc.com
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #3050  
    Senior Member Luis Ortiz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    NJ-Serial#1321
    Posts
    270
    Mr. Mullen,

    Thanks for your response regarding shooting a fight scene. You truly are one of the best things on this forum. I've learned a lot reading your posts. May God bless you with many good things.

    Quote Originally Posted by David Mullen ASC View Post
    Have you seen this Tony Ja fight scene that happens in one continuous take?
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yXIGP6_fNZk
    And yes, I have seen this clip. One of my favorites.

    Reply With Quote  
     

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts