Click here to go to the first RED TEAM post in this thread.   Thread: Ask David Mullen ANYTHING

Reply to Thread
Page 142 of 480 FirstFirst ... 4292132138139140141142143144145146152192242 ... LastLast
Results 1,411 to 1,420 of 4800
  1. #1411  
    Quote Originally Posted by miha View Post
    In ACM October 2008 Lubezki laments when we was given HD Dailies only for "Burn After Reading": In HD you can't... judge focus.
    Why does he say that? Do we need 4K now to judge focus?
    He may mean that compared to projected 35mm prints on a screen, it's hard to judge focus in HD dailies viewed on a monitor. 1080P projected on a large screen should be sharp enough to see most problems but even then, some things may be slipping by.
    David Mullen, ASC
    Los Angeles
    http://www.davidmullenasc.com
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #1412  
    Quote Originally Posted by RedVision View Post
    Shot an insert with the Red. Used a tungsten light and a green gel pack on the other tungsten light. Could not get the Red to read the green, kept looking very blue. I know the clients can color correct that easily but you know how commercial clients can be! How could I get the Red to read the tungsten light and the green light? Didn't have any HMI's in my package. Thanks.
    Despite this seeming impossible with Reds green sensitivity. I've seen this. I suspect Red has an uneven green sensitivity .

    Despite having seen a green screen end up with a blue tinge it still keyed a treat (better than anything else I've used).

    Michael
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #1413  
    Senior Member Sarah C.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    397
    Does this green issue have to do with the in-camera interpretation of the Bayer-Pattern Imaging Sensor?

    ~Sarah
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4.   Click here to go to the next RED TEAM post in this thread.
  #1414  
    Red Team Deanan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    3,847
    Quote Originally Posted by Michael Lindsay View Post
    Despite this seeming impossible with Reds green sensitivity. I've seen this. I suspect Red has an uneven green sensitivity .

    Despite having seen a green screen end up with a blue tinge it still keyed a treat (better than anything else I've used).

    Michael
    I've seen a couple of cases of customer footage regarding this and in each case it was because WB was set too high or too low. White balancing to something white in the shot fixed the balance.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #1415  
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    9
    Mr. Mullen,
    I was reading earlier you're explanation of Roger Deakins' night lighting in No Country. You suggested to just not putting yourself in that situation, but what are you're thoughts on day for night.... the most recent example I can think of being, The Proposition. I really enjoyed those huge nighttime landscapes. Do you like this effect?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #1416  
    I grew up in the desert and when you are away from any other light sources, a moonlit landscape can seem like a day-for-night effect in a movie, other than the dark sky and stars. It's just that a lot of viewers don't have that personal experience of seeing large areas of desert illuminated by a full moon.

    I posted these before, but here are some real night shots I took with my Nikon under moonlight, shot with a tungsten preset for a blue cast, underexposed by about two or three stops:





    And this was exposed longer in the same moonlight:



    So you see that daylight and moonlight are rather similar.

    The main problem with day-for-night, besides the dark night sky, is if any other light sources appear in the frame, like car headlights, a flashlight, campfire, etc.
    David Mullen, ASC
    Los Angeles
    http://www.davidmullenasc.com
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #1417  
    Senior Member Matthew Greene's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Las Vegas
    Posts
    200
    That last one is pretty awesome in making your point.
    Matthew Greene
    Associate Producer & Technical Director
    Siegfried & Roy Present
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #1418  
    Senior Member Charles Angus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    1,055
    I have noticed that before myself - odd how our perception of night is so different.
    Charles Angus Taylor
    www.charlesangustaylor.com
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #1419  
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    813
    Quote Originally Posted by AngusChandler View Post
    odd how our perception of night is so different.
    Some of the color shift at night happens because of the Purkinje effect:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Purkinje_effect
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #1420  
    Senior Member Matthew Greene's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Las Vegas
    Posts
    200
    Thanks joofa, that's new to me. I've had pretty good results at lighting realistic ext. nights although I've never lit large areas, just small ones. All this info is good to know to have the know how when it comes to making decisions.
    Matthew Greene
    Associate Producer & Technical Director
    Siegfried & Roy Present
    Reply With Quote  
     

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts