David, could you list a couple of films shot with Panavision Primo primes? Also, in your opinion, what lens set matches the Primos in terms of contrast and flare management? Thanks.
|
|
David, could you list a couple of films shot with Panavision Primo primes? Also, in your opinion, what lens set matches the Primos in terms of contrast and flare management? Thanks.
There are too many Primo lensed shoots to mention, almost anything shot on a Panaflex is probably using Primo lenses. The "Pirates of the Caribbean" trilogy is one big-budget example.
I think the Zeiss Ultra Primes are similar.
What is the difference between a zoom and a variable prime? Is there even a difference?
Not really a difference, though in theory a variable prime is not designed to be zoomed during the shot because artifacts that happen in motion (shifting, ramping, etc.) don't have to be designed out if it's just going to be used as a variable prime. However, those Zeiss Variable Primes worked fine as short zooms.
Hi David,
I was linked off the Rubber Monkey Software page. For a RED workflow, I'm doing just fine, but the Sony EX3 camera is where I run into turn. In FCP 6.0.5, I have XDCAM EX 1080p24 quicktimes with timecode created by the camera.
I was hoping you could help me out regarding exporting a still image sequence (tiff or DPX) out of FCP that will preserve the timecode. I'd take this image sequence to a color correct, so they can apply the grade and I'd receive a D5 with same timecode from my dailies so that the conform can use an EDL from FCP.
The alternate workflow I am using now is to make 5 second handles on each cut before making an image sequence and at the conform the flame artist sets in and out point of 5 seconds for each side of the cut. It comes down to eye matching over the exactness of an EDL.
Is there a program equivalent to Monkey Extract that can read the original .mp4 file from an FCP XML file and create timecode embedded DPX sequences or any another workaround?
Thank you,
Colin
David,
I have a pretty big question. What should the role of tungsten lighting be with the next generation of digital cinema cameras?
I know that you have written how you like the look of tungsten on faces. If the sensors and processing are up to the task, then are we going to want to see more tungsten than daylight? It seems all the classics have that pink/red facial lighting that really stands out.
How do you decide about tungsten vs. daylight bulbs when you shoot digital?
| « Previous Thread | Next Thread » |