Thread: shutter instead of ND?

Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12
  1. #1 shutter instead of ND? 
    Senior Member Johan Pabon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    224
    Today I made some slowmotions using the only ND filter I have: 0.6 ND.
    When recording at normal speed (25) I forgot to put the shutter back to 50.
    The shootings look good which gives me following question: Why not use the shutter to regulate the amount of light?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2  
    Corrected below.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3  
    Senior Member Julio Quintana's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Posts
    1,468
    Quote Originally Posted by Raul Gonzo View Post
    Shutter can not change the amount of light in your raw file like an ND or closing the iris.
    Uh, yes it can. The reason people typically do not change the shutter angle to control exposure is that it changes the look of the motion. Fast shutter angle = Saving Private Ryan. Slow shutter angle = Miami Vice.
    Julio Quintana
    www.juliomquintana.com

    EPIC-X #560
    Canon Lens Package-
    -11-16mm f2.8
    -16-35mm f2.8
    -24mm f1.4
    -35mm f1.4
    -50mm f1.2
    -85mm f1.2
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4  
    Senior Member Brandon Fraley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Bay Area, Ca.
    Posts
    2,243
    Quote Originally Posted by Raul Gonzo View Post
    Shutter can not change the amount of light in your raw file like an ND or closing the iris.
    it certainly does change the amount of light in your RAW file. Your choice of shutter is burned into your footage, it's not metadata that can be changed later. I've heard the shutter controls referred to as "the Poor Man's ND". If you're in a pinch, you can increase the shutter angle and to decrease the amount of light hitting the sensor, but it will change the look of the motion in your footage. Sometimes this if fine, or preferred, but other times it can be very distracting.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5  
    Ha, I thought about that after I said it. Thanks Julio!
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6  
    Depends on the amount of motion in a scene. I recall a James Bond movie ("View to a Kill" I think) where they must have closed the shutter a little in bright sunshine, and some horses were galloping by the shot and strobing badly. So generally you would avoid short shutter speeds outdoors unless you wanted more motion strobe.
    David Mullen, ASC
    Los Angeles
    http://www.davidmullenasc.com
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #7  
    Also be aware that on the RED One (and pretty much any other CMOS camera) the read reset times of the sensor are constant. So by decreasing the exposure time (faster shutter speed), you can exaggerate the "rolling shutter" skew effect. This happens due to the decreased overall exposure time relative to the CMOS reset time and also due to the reduction of motion blur, which normally softens the skew effect somewhat.

    Typically, your motion will become extremely stuttery or stacato or will strobe severely before the annoying skew effect takes over. But just something to keep in mind if you start to really use faster shutter speeds / shorter exposures.
    - Jeff Kilgroe
    - Applied Visual Technologies, LLC | RojoMojo
    - EPIC-M Package Available! Over 1TB SSD media, RPP's & more.


    List of all current RED software tools.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #8  
    Senior Member Johan Pabon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    224
    Okay, everything you describe happens in a very slight way indeed because the movements are not that fast. There also seems to be some inteferention in some shots, whereas the slowmo's are great.
    Thanks for all your comments on the question.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #9 Miami Vice 
    Senior Member Johan Pabon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    224
    Quote Originally Posted by Julio Quintana View Post
    Uh, yes it can. The reason people typically do not change the shutter angle to control exposure is that it changes the look of the motion. Fast shutter angle = Saving Private Ryan. Slow shutter angle = Miami Vice.
    Do you know which shutter speed they use?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #10  
    Senior Member Brandon Fraley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Bay Area, Ca.
    Posts
    2,243
    Not specifically, but 45deg is standard for the "Saving Private Ryan" look, and Michael Mann shootis a lot with a 360deg shutter, which a lot of people here, myself included, think ruins the cinematic look, but if you need the extra light it's there.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts