Sometimes at c.com I feel like a guy at a horse-and-buggy convention in 1909 trying to tell everyone that cars are the way of the future. "Why would people need cars? Horses can run 40mph....blah blah blah."
Even as the molehill of evidence showing the ascendance of 4K as a display format has turned into a mountain of evidence right before their eyes, a lot these guys are still claiming that 4K is "not needed." David, as usual, takes a reasoned, conservative approach, but a lot of the other guys there seem to be resisting 4K at all cost.
Of course many of them are the exact same guys who told us that 4K cameras would never sell, were not "needed," and would never be built anytime soon. :couch:
Anyway, I thought it was a fun debate and am wondering what you guys here think?