Thread: "diving-bell" look - in camera?

Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 3 of 3

Hybrid View

  1. #1 "diving-bell" look - in camera? 
    Hey there-

    shooting on the RED for my first time and lacking the budget or schedule to do tests. I have a sequence thats meant to be in heaven, a la "Diving Bell & the butterfly", working with shift tilt lenses. I'm looking for advice on how to best achieve a gauzy feel with blooming highlights. How much of this should be done in camera vs. saved for post.

    Also seeking advice on how i should be rating my exposure outside for this sequence, vs the rest of the film which is interior, dark corridors, flourescent bulbs - looking for rich blacks in the shadows.

    any advice greatly appreciated,

    thanks,

    cv
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2  
    Hi- Faced with a similar problem last year- I made my own limited version of a lensbaby by using the front element of a projector lens I had 'lying around'. -I made bellows from cinefoil and garden wire, all loving stuck together with gaffer tape... Works a treat.

    You can approximate this effect in post- but when done optically, it separates the light in a way I have not seen with digital effects.

    (sorry for the low quality image- bad camera phone in the dark)

    Using it cost me a couple of stops of light.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3  
    Although the lens baby only costs $500 or so and that's what they used for the film
    Fredrik Callinggard (formerly known as weirdcrew)

    http://www.uitchiscratch.com

    fc@aeoncine.com
    Reply With Quote  
     

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts