Click here to go to the first RED TEAM post in this thread.   Thread: Microsoft unveils new controller - Amazing

Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 36
  1. #11  
    Senior Member Joseph Ward's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    1,141
    Quote Originally Posted by Brook Willard View Post
    Atarrrrrrri!!!
    haha! Good one Brook! You Arrgh right!
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #12  
    Quote Originally Posted by PaulClements View Post
    In the other article, it was very interesting reading Spielberg's take on it. That up until now we haven't been able to cry at a video game, to be emotionally involved in the same way we can be moved by a film's narrative. It certainly puts into perspective the possibilities of emersion within a game using such technology.

    Paul
    Yeah, I've gotta disagree w/what Spielberg said as well. There have been a number of games where I've felt emotionally connected to what was going on onscreen. Like w/movies, it's not how good it looks visually but how compelling the story is that pulls people in emotionally.

    Quote Originally Posted by Ethan Cooper View Post
    so what's the catch? I mean what happens if you don't play along with Milo and start trying to take him in other directions with what you're saying. Can he react to that?
    Peter Molyneux has always been pushing the forefront of AI in games and this is basically his next step so while I'm sure there will be limits to how Milo can respond I think he's going to be as interactive as possible given the confines of game development resources (money, processing power, file size limits, etc.,.) Milo is going to be more along the lines of an advanced virtual pet then a game. Kinda like an updated version of Seaman for the DreamCast.


    -Andrew
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #13  
    Frontline Infantry
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    London/Sydney
    Posts
    1,415
    Quote Originally Posted by Brook Willard View Post
    Atarrrrrrri!!!
    thats funny :)
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #14  
    Quote Originally Posted by Brook Willard View Post
    Atarrrrrrri!!!
    I am disinclined to acquiesce to your bad jokes!
    EPIC-X: #1908 "Ataraxia"
    O'connor 2060HD support
    www.napavalleyhd.com
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #15  
    Senior Member Andrew Walker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Burbank, CA
    Posts
    1,954
    Wow, I'm thinking about this with first-person shooters. If you had a large enough room to play a game where the controls had you run to cover and play the level like that. I could see that being amazing not only for gaming but for training.
    Check out my new timelapse reel "Illuminate the Heavens" http://vimeo.com/33181548

    Custom Timelapse Shots using Epic and the 5D3
    http://599productions.com
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #16  
    REDuser Sponsor Andy Jarosz's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    536
    Yeah, but I don't wanna have a conversation with my Xbox. I wanna start fragging people and swearing into a headset. This seems perfect for an awesome HAL 9000, but not so good perhaps for game consoles.

    "I'm sorry Dave, I'm afraid I can't do that. Wanna fish instead?"
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #17  
    Quote Originally Posted by Ethan Cooper View Post
    so what's the catch? I mean what happens if you don't play along with Milo and start trying to take him in other directions with what you're saying. Can he react to that?
    That was my first question. And I'm assuming that the level of interaction and responses are finite and based on a matrix of pre-programmed actions, emotions and responses. In other words, if you stray outside the confines of the game world, then the software won't have an appropriate response other than to try and draw you back into its world in some way.

    That said, the interface and level of interaction is very impressive. I can envision tons of applications for this technology, most of them not game-related.
    - Jeff Kilgroe
    - Applied Visual Technologies, LLC | RojoMojo
    - EPIC-M Package Available! Over 1TB SSD media, RPP's & more.


    List of all current RED software tools.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #18  
    Senior Member Peter Mosiman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Santa Monica
    Posts
    568
    Quote Originally Posted by karapetkov View Post
    ... and a little frightening. :couch:
    very!
    It isn't the cinematographer who owns the film, but rather the film and its story that owns the cinematographer." -- Anthony Dod Mantle, ASC
    --
    "Lose the ego. Do great work and take pride in it, but don’t be arrogant about how great you think you are." - Chuck Russom

    Gaffers Unite! - A blog dedicated to lighting/rigging techniques.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #19  
    Even if it was like Mass Effect and were given a teleprompter I think it might be interesting.

    Honestly I've become emotionally attached to characters and places before in games. If anything interactivity makes games less emotional so I don't really see any immediate effects on the art of storytelling.

    1) Don't have the character to stupid tasks. You don't see Luke Skywalker out doing his nightly chores collecting 30 transformers. There is a reason it's not showed in movies. It slows the story and gets in the way.
    2) Don't have a 4 hour battle. Again. Movies have 30 minute action sequences and that's often pushing audience sustainability.
    3) Don't make the player go back in time. If you train your player to continually replay something they'll completely forget context and it'll become a puzzle. An unemotional left brained mechanism to be defeated.
    4) Create places people would want to explore. Having an amazing setting that is someplace you might want to wander around on vacation is the goal.
    5) Keep the player moving to the next plot point to find out what happens next. 4 hours of "go to the next room". Could just as easily be 4 hours of playing the same room. There needs to be a page turning sequence of events.
    6) Make your game shorter. 40 hours isn't necessary. Movies do just fine with 2. 5-6 hours is all you can get out of your story.

    Maybe around #1,000 would I put "be able to physically control your character". This will be great for party games and other fun silly things like that which I would definitely buy it for but... after playing a great game for an hour or two I no longer have any conception of a controller in my head. The classic story is I was playing a game and someone walked up behind me and started talking and I turned around my game character instinctively to speak to them. It's the same with Bicycles, skis, cars and even shoes we tune out all of the things around us and can reach a zenlike state where the brain starts using the devices as an extension of the body. I would be far more interested in eye tracking and 3D glasses than hand tracking.
    Gavin Greenwalt || im.thatoneguy
    im.thatoneguy[at]gmail.com | Straightface Studios | VFX & Animation
    Canon Scarlet-X package available to rent in Seattle, WA
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #20  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    360
    Quote Originally Posted by Jay Voutour View Post



    IDK about that, I was pretty blown away with Metal Gear Solid (PSOne), FFXIII, and Star Control 2 (one of the best games ever made, IMO). The depth of the story of those games was incredible for the time, considering that up until then, the plots of the most popular video games were 'goomba-jump-koopa-jump-Bowser-jump-jump-jump-end'.

    What?

    MGS was cool, Star Control...Okay...

    But FFXIII? Come on now. RPG's have had incredible storylines since the dawn of the genre. The real peak for console gaming depth came when SNES hit. Titles like Final Fantasy Six (3 in US) set the bar for things to come and my personal favorite...

    Chrono Trigger. There hasn't been a game based on time Travel YET that can come close to what Chrono Trigger's storyline offered.

    How about Final Fantasy 7? Squaresoft's star franchise? The plot of that game was so thick you had to play through it twice to understand a quarter of it. And each time you rolled through it, it was a good 40 Hours of playtime at minimum, or you'd get your ass handed to you by Safer Sephiroth.

    Gotta go back further, man. SNES's RPG plot-lines are incredible and were what truly began to define the "story" within a game.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts