Thread: Oakley merger

Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1 Oakley merger 
    Does the Oakley Luxottica merger effect RED at all? Are RED and Oakley completely seperate?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    1,559
    separate company ...
    i think it was a buy out = somebody has alot of CASH that could go into RED ?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3  
    Moderator Tom Lowe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    somewhere worshiping Terrence Malick
    Posts
    8,207
    I think somebody already has a lot of cash, and it's going into RED. :)
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4  
    Senior Member Greg Voevodsky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Silicon Valley, CA
    Posts
    376
    Oakley, if the deal goes through, was bought for more than 1 billion. Jim has a non compete clause and will stay on the board. In other words, Jim is about to spend his full time on RED and have over 1 billion dollars in cash to help fund his new love - RED. Rejoice... this is great news, as Oakley will no longer distract Jim as much. He has chosen RED as his new company.

    The real question is when will Jim build a new RED building since his cool Oakley building is no longer his. (My question though, does the B-52 rocket ejection seats in the waiting room, and Jim's dragster on the wall go with the sell or will he build a new RED building to hang them in along the other relics like panavision, dalsa, arriflex, film and early digital cameras... ;-)
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5  
    Senior Member Don Woods's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    558
    Well All I can say is congrats. Jim and googd luck on the new ventures..
    Reply With Quote  
     

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts