For most people it would be enough, IMHO.
Yes. It's only money. (Cost rises exponentially with area for the good crystal ones.)
I think MTF is the best way to measure the effect of diffraction. The higher the frequency, the lower the MTF (i.e., smaller pixels have lower MTF at Nyquist due to diffraction).
To avoid aliasing, an MTF of 0% would be the theoretical ideal, but in practical situations I don't think it's necessary to go that low. I think 10% MTF is sufficient to prevent aliasing. Using the formula for MTF of diffraction[*], I calculate that MTF drops to 10% for green light (550nm) at f/11 at 3.7 micron pixels. Using red light (750nm) I get 5 micron pixels. Both of these are slightly smaller than the 6 micron pixels in the EPICs.
Again, it's a question of what MTF you consider aliasing taken care of.
[*] 2/pi*(acos(f)-f.*sqrt(1-f.^2)) where f is 1/(w*f-number).



