Thread: Linear or circular polarizer? Need help

Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15
  1. #1 Linear or circular polarizer? Need help 
    Senior Member Shawn Nelson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Portland, OR
    Posts
    4,456
    I need to get me a polarizer that will be used on my RPPs, Red 300mm & the occasional odd lens (such as my old Angeneiux 25-250mm T3.9).

    My matte box is usually the RedRock for which I obtained a 5.65x5.65 filter tray, and sometimes I use a smaller light-weight 2-stage Chrosziel 4x5.65.

    Two part question:
    1. Do I get linear or circular? I've long though of circular as superior, but recently I heard that circular is only needed if being used on a CCD system. Really? Don't you still need to be able to rotate? I'm confused. I also read David Mullen talking about Circ Pols sometimes causing artifacts in the sky on a pan. Whoa! Can Linears do this too?

    2. Size: 4x5.65 or 5.65x5.65? I supposed this is related to part 1. If I get linear then I might as well only get 4x5.65 since I won't be rotating it.

    It's odd to be coming into this problem now. I had previously solved this by having a 72mm screw-on circ pol that I used on my Red 18-50mm, nice and light, but now have different lenses.
    "Only those who attempt the absurd will achieve the impossible." -MC Escher
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2  
    Senior Member George A.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    New York City, NY
    Posts
    1,043
    Hi Shawn!

    Look more into the differences between circular and linear polarizers. You can rotate a linear polarizer, no problems. Circular polarizer means something else.

    Check this for a start:

    http://reviews.ebay.com/Circular-vs-...00000002144386
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3  
    Senior Member Liam Hall's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    London/Worldwide
    Posts
    1,432
    You only need a linear polar but you still need to rotate. Circular polar filters are for autofocus cameras.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4  
    Senior Member Shawn Nelson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Portland, OR
    Posts
    4,456
    Okay, so my Red doesnt autofocus, but Epic/Scarlet might and i'll probably get both of those. A 5.65x5.65 circ pol is the same price as the linear.

    What's the disadvantages of going circ?
    "Only those who attempt the absurd will achieve the impossible." -MC Escher
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5  
    Quote Originally Posted by Liam Hall View Post
    You only need a linear polar but you still need to rotate. Circular polar filters are for autofocus cameras.
    Close, but not quite. I believe circular polas are for any camera that has a prism in it. So a film camera that has a video tap needs one and so does any 3CCD camera (which are most pro broadcast cameras.)

    I may be wrong about that, but I know you are supposed to use a circular pola if you have a video tap on a film camera.

    Matthew
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6  
    Senior Member Stacey Spears's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Sammamish, WA
    Posts
    1,106
    Shawn,

    I have a pola frame if you are interested. I originally paid $1100, but am willing to sale it for $500. It uses a Schneider linear pola inside. It fits in the RedRock mattebox. It is what I used when I had the mattebox. I now have an MMB1 and had to get a smaller filter.

    Here is a picture of the filter. http://www.filtergallery.com/Non-Chromatic_Filters.html
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #7  
    Junior Member Jamesl169's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Valencia, California USA
    Posts
    10
    "A Circular Polarizer has the same effect as a Polarizer and is used on cameras with beam splitting metering systems commonly found on auto focus SLR's (for most 35mm auto-focus cameras see your camera manual). "

    Direct from Tiffen filters.

    "Beam splitters send light in two directions: to an eye-piece and to a video tap. Light in a camera’s viewing system can become polarized, and when a standard (linear) polarizing filter is attached to the lens, the light becomes cross polarized. This hinders visibility and may create total black-out of the viewing image and/or the video tap."

    Direct from Schneider Optics B&W filters.


    Hope this answers your question.

    Regards,
    James
    James Lee
    16x9 Inc. | +661.295.3313 | jamesl@16x9inc.com | WWW.16X9INC.COM
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #8  
    Senior Member Rich Schaefer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    SoCal & Tyrol-Austria
    Posts
    945
    Be safe and get the circular, it will work with all cameras.

    Liner will work on most cameras, but it there is a beam splitter like on my Moviecam Compact or many Arris the video or eyepeice will go black as you rotate the filter. Its a pola vs/ beamsplitter coating issue....

    Prost,
    Rich
    3 Epics! M462, X108, X1266
    Epic 3D Beamsplitter 3D Rig-FIZ controled, 3D S/S rigs, Excellent 8ton G&E Truck!
    2 RedOnes #115 & #3090
    Local 600-D.P.
    www.highimpactpictures.com
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #9  
    Senior Member Sanjin Jukic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Vienna, Austria
    Posts
    8,711
    "Circular Vs. Linear Polarizers

    There are two types of polarizing filters available — linear or circular.

    Linear polarizers are more effective and less expensive than circular ones.

    But circular polarizers are needed with just about any camera that has a through-the-lens metering system, or autofocus.

    The reason for this is that both of these systems use semi-silvered mirrors to siphon off some of the light coming though the lens.

    If that light is linearly polarized it renders either the metering or the autofocus ineffective.

    This means that you're going to have to buy circular polarizers unless you're shooting with a pre-1970's camera, or a view camera."


    More>>>

    To conclude is to say if you use a linear polarizer (for manual focus camera)...
    "There is no point in having sharp images when you've fuzzy ideas."
    Jean-Luc Godard.

    Dynamic range is, after all, the measurement between well saturation (photosite blowout) and noise floor.
    Thom Hogan


    --------

    500px >>>
    Twitter >>>
    Facebook >>>
    Vimeo >>>
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #10  
    Linear is fine for RED now... But I would get the circular. It may future-proof you if upcoming Epic S35 or future cameras offer autofocus ability with the RED mount electronic lenses... Circular isn't really any more expensive these days. 4x5.65" size covers the RPPs fine, but you'll want a 5.65x5.65 for pola or grads you rotate.

    I like the Formatt 5.65x5.65 one and it's around $260 from AbelCine or FilmTools. The Tiffen and Schneider ones are good too.
    - Jeff Kilgroe
    - Applied Visual Technologies, LLC | RojoMojo
    - EPIC-M Package Available! Over 1TB SSD media, RPP's & more.


    List of all current RED software tools.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts