Thread: Matching Red footage to telecined 16mm film

Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Hybrid View

  1. #1 Matching Red footage to telecined 16mm film 
    Senior Member Kaku Ito's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Chiyoda-ku, tokyo
    Posts
    2,739
    Can anyone share the experiences and suggest treatment for R3D file to match with telecined 16mm film footage?

    The director was concerned about obvious differences in clarity, so at this point, I suggested something below:

    1. lower detailed setting like leading lady
    2. OLPF set to low or none
    3. higher ISO setting to add grain

    Would these treatment do justice to match the film footage? The final would be presented as HD 422 file played on DLP.

    Thank you for sharing your thoughts in advance.
    Kaku Ito

    rawesome! Equipments
    RED Epic-M, RED Epic-x, RED ONE MX x2, RED ONE Mysterium, Allstar A-mount, Epic Canon Ti Mount, 1.8' SSD modules, RED PRO Prime Set (18 through 100mm), various Nikon and Zeiss Lenses, 17-55mm RED Pro Zoom, 18-85mm RED Pro Zoom, x2 RED ROCKET, Mobile Rocket, DaVinci Resolve, Cubix, GTX-285, Quadro 4000, few Mac Pros, few MacBook Pros, Sony BVM-D24, Panasonic 65 inch Series 12 plasma, Calman with Klein probe.

    Rawesome! One Stop RAW Visual Production Service
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2  
    Hi Kaku,

    I shot tons of 16mm and had once a project where I had to match 16mm with R3Ds. The two biggest differences are a) resolution and b) texture (grain). The in your post suggested settings are much to subtle, IMHO. Between 16mm and 4K Red files are light years.

    While 16mm rarely resolve 1080p and is much closer to 720p, 4K R3Ds are obviously beyond 1080p. The first thing would be to match resolution. Scaling down to 720p or a bit higher, say 800p and then uspscale to 1080p using a tool like Shake is a good beginning. Then we have to match texture. This is much more complicated since film grain is not noise. For satisfying results we need a tool that samples the grain of the source. The Foundry's Furnace tool set has a great grain sample tool. You take a sample of the 16mm footage and use this as a reference for the R3D file, very convenient.

    Any footage that should match needs appropriate colour correction. I would do this prior to the grain management process.

    Hans
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3  
    Senior Member Kaku Ito's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Chiyoda-ku, tokyo
    Posts
    2,739
    Hans,

    Thank you very much for sharing your information.

    I will take your advise and create some samples for them. I don't have Furnace, but I'll test what I have, like "Looks" and other things (I should buy Graeme's filters maybe to show appreciation for his work here).

    I just tried making 720p files using ROCKETcine-X and 7 minute worth of footage was converted to ProRes422Proxy took 7 minutes. Realtime, beautiful. So it takes no effort for me to make various samples for them.

    Thank again and let you know
    Kaku Ito

    rawesome! Equipments
    RED Epic-M, RED Epic-x, RED ONE MX x2, RED ONE Mysterium, Allstar A-mount, Epic Canon Ti Mount, 1.8' SSD modules, RED PRO Prime Set (18 through 100mm), various Nikon and Zeiss Lenses, 17-55mm RED Pro Zoom, 18-85mm RED Pro Zoom, x2 RED ROCKET, Mobile Rocket, DaVinci Resolve, Cubix, GTX-285, Quadro 4000, few Mac Pros, few MacBook Pros, Sony BVM-D24, Panasonic 65 inch Series 12 plasma, Calman with Klein probe.

    Rawesome! One Stop RAW Visual Production Service
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4  
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    64
    Magic bullet have a great quality of grain plugin.
    can help.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5  
    Senior Member Charles Angus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    1,055
    I would shoot the RED footage clean. Don't bump the ISO - noise looks VERY different from gain.

    For one thing, noise is most prevalent in the shadows, whereas grain occurs throughout the image. The most realistic way to match grain is to shoot grain plates on the stock you're matching to - roll an out-of-focus grey card filling the frame for a minute or so, and comp that grain over all the RED stuff.

    Downscaling and then upscaling can introduce ringing artifacts if you use the wrong filters; I would suggest simply blurring the 4k and then re-sizing it to 1080 (or whatever you're finishing at) in order to lower the res.
    Charles Angus Taylor
    www.charlesangustaylor.com
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6  
    Senior Member Kaku Ito's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Chiyoda-ku, tokyo
    Posts
    2,739
    Thanks all, I will test all of these various ways tomorrow and show it to the director.
    Kaku Ito

    rawesome! Equipments
    RED Epic-M, RED Epic-x, RED ONE MX x2, RED ONE Mysterium, Allstar A-mount, Epic Canon Ti Mount, 1.8' SSD modules, RED PRO Prime Set (18 through 100mm), various Nikon and Zeiss Lenses, 17-55mm RED Pro Zoom, 18-85mm RED Pro Zoom, x2 RED ROCKET, Mobile Rocket, DaVinci Resolve, Cubix, GTX-285, Quadro 4000, few Mac Pros, few MacBook Pros, Sony BVM-D24, Panasonic 65 inch Series 12 plasma, Calman with Klein probe.

    Rawesome! One Stop RAW Visual Production Service
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #7  
    Senior Member Noah Kadner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    1,805
    Definitely shoot clean and normal- much simpler to match up in post than to do it in production and be stuck with a look that can't be undone.

    Noah
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #8  
    Senior Member Kaku Ito's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Chiyoda-ku, tokyo
    Posts
    2,739
    shooting is already done, so I'd have to do it in post. I will first try the Red Giant Looks.
    Kaku Ito

    rawesome! Equipments
    RED Epic-M, RED Epic-x, RED ONE MX x2, RED ONE Mysterium, Allstar A-mount, Epic Canon Ti Mount, 1.8' SSD modules, RED PRO Prime Set (18 through 100mm), various Nikon and Zeiss Lenses, 17-55mm RED Pro Zoom, 18-85mm RED Pro Zoom, x2 RED ROCKET, Mobile Rocket, DaVinci Resolve, Cubix, GTX-285, Quadro 4000, few Mac Pros, few MacBook Pros, Sony BVM-D24, Panasonic 65 inch Series 12 plasma, Calman with Klein probe.

    Rawesome! One Stop RAW Visual Production Service
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #9  
    Senior Member Shawn Bannon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    379
    Did you shoot super 16mm? and what iso film stock? I've shot two films with red footage and super 16mm. And what type of telecine are you doing? There is a lot you can do in this stage. Get the lowest noise telecine possible and it will make your life a whole lot easier. Or go for the Datatcine when ready.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #10  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    571
    We recently intercut R3D files with super-16mm footage shot about 9 years ago, re-transfered at 1080p. We removed the grain from the film footage (using noise-reducing software as I recall) and it matched quite well.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts