Frankencamera

[I Bloom]

http://news.stanford.edu/news/2009/a...ra-090109.html

Cheers,
IBloom

[Brent J. Craig]

Cool. Especially: "Another algorithm that researchers have achieved in the lab, but no commercial camera allows, is enhancing the resolution of videos with high-resolution still photographs. While a camera is gathering low-resolution video at 30 frames a second, it could also periodically take a high-resolution still image. The extra information in the still could then be recombined by an algorithm into each video frame. "

This is exactly why it would be cool for Red to eventually allow us hackers more access than the current SDK.

I wonder how many Red ideas/patents the Stanford kids will stumble upon?

[Graeme Nattress]

Of course, better still is just to take the full resolution on every frame, which is exactly what we do do.

Graeme

[KETCH ROSSi]

Of course, better still is just to take the full resolution on every frame, which is exactly what we do do.

Graeme

..and this is why we love you for it!!

[Brent J. Craig]

Of course, better still is just to take the full resolution on every frame, which is exactly what we do do.

Oh yeah. I didn't think of that part :-)

[Joseph Ward]

They make it sound that it will be sold only to students and universities.

[C.H.Haskell]

I wouldn't mind if my RED had an auto dynamic range mode. ;)

[Matthias Hutter]

According to CNET, they use the camera module of the Nokia N95, so why bother. But there is some other nice "open source" hardware out there with a strong community support.

[Karl Gustav H.]

According to CNET, they use the camera module of the Nokia N95, so why bother. But there is some other nice "open source" hardware out there with a strong community support.

The open-ness here is with the backend; not the acquisition device.

You could both anything you want (Dalsa scientific sensors for an example) to a readily available, open backend to massively reduce the time and cost of producing a dedicated camera setup.