Thread: Image stabilization

Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 35
  1. #1 Image stabilization 
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    88
    I tried searching, but found little discussion on this topic here or on DVXUser.com

    Any idea if RED will have this feature?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2  
    Senior Member Stephen Williams's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    3,882
    Quote Originally Posted by beatniq View Post
    I tried searching, but found little discussion on this topic here or on DVXUser.com

    Any idea if RED will have this feature?
    Hi,

    I think that is something you can do in post far better than in camera.

    Stephen
    Epic M owner
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3  
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    88
    Quote Originally Posted by Stephen Williams View Post
    Hi,

    I think that is something you can do in post far better than in camera.

    Stephen
    I read a little about that and I've not heard good things - a lot about blurriness and other issues when done in post.

    Do you know if FCP can do this? I've played with the "Image Stabilizer" filter in FCP but it never seemed to work very well, though I must admit I haven't done much more than just fiddle with it.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4  
    Some lenses have Image stabilization built in, but most likely your best solution would be to use After Effects (shake, combustion) to stabilize a shot.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5  
    Senior Member Stephen Williams's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    3,882
    Quote Originally Posted by beatniq View Post
    I read a little about that and I've not heard good things - a lot about blurriness and other issues when done in post.

    Do you know if FCP can do this? I've played with the "Image Stabilizer" filter in FCP but it never seemed to work very well, though I must admit I haven't done much more than just fiddle with it.
    Hi,

    Not sure about FCP but after effects and any effects programme will have tracking software. You will always loose resoloution, however starting with a 4k image will help.

    Stephen
    Epic M owner
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6  
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    88
    Quote Originally Posted by kinobairn View Post
    Some lenses have Image stabilization built in, but most likely your best solution would be to use After Effects (shake, combustion) to stabilize a shot.
    Wow. That is going to be a difficult workflow for ENG/EFP.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #7  
    Senior Member Stephen Williams's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    3,882
    Quote Originally Posted by beatniq View Post
    Wow. That is going to be a difficult workflow for ENG/EFP.
    Hi,

    FWIW very few broadcast lenses have stabalization, the ones that do are very expensive. I don't know of any broadcast cameras that have such a feature.

    Stephen
    Epic M owner
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #8  
    Stabilization is kind of a broad topic.

    Lens: The long ENG lenses (we have a Fujinon HA42X13.5) have stabilization, but it really is for wind shake and such only. High frequency small amplitude stuff.

    Post: We have had excellent results in Avid Media Composer HD with motion tracking and stabilization (stabilize or smooth). Sometime you have to slightly crop or zoom the picture afterwards, but it can make a huge difference with little or no loss of rez depending on the shot. It helps if you shoot at a higher frame rate like 60P (less delta t between samples for the software) with a fast shutter (even if you then have to go back in and add motion blur in post to reduce strobing at 24P). We often shoot 60P with a 24P timecode to allow us to do this in post (overcranking 2.5 times)

    GyroStabilization: The bigger problem is shooting from a boat or helicopter or other vehicle where you are dealing with both low frequency (boat rolling in moderate seas) and high frequency motion (boat vibrating as you work the engines/props to maneuver while holding the shot). There are some great gyrostabilization solutions out there. MakoHead and Cineflex are the two I am familiar with and both are excellent in different ways.

    Of course there are Steadicam type rigs, but I have never used them and have no experience.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #9  
    Senior Member Martin Drew's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    675
    Hi Beatniq

    Trying to avoid shake on a small camcorder is very tricky, hence the ubiquitous built in stabilisation. You will find that you get a lot less shake with a large pro or broadcast camera, just because of the greater mass involved. It is far easier to move the camera smoothly when it has a bit if weight.

    Martin
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #10  
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    88
    Quote Originally Posted by Martin View Post
    Hi Beatniq

    Trying to avoid shake on a small camcorder is very tricky, hence the ubiquitous built in stabilisation. You will find that you get a lot less shake with a large pro or broadcast camera, just because of the greater mass involved. It is far easier to move the camera smoothly when it has a bit if weight.

    Martin
    That is reassuring. Though the RED is actually pretty lightweight, I'm sure with all of the accessories I'll be putting on it, it will gain some much needed mass.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts