Thread: Filters in Front of a Long Lens

Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 36
  1. #11  
    In my experience, schneider filters seem to be best. Less colour shift in nd grads.

    If going for tiffen, water white glass is best.
    Steve Gray
    Dop
    London
    http://www.stevegraydop.com
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #12  
    Senior Member Pawel Achtel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Tasmania
    Posts
    3,603
    Clearly, this could not have been settled without a proper test.

    The Setup:
    • Van Diemen Leica Apo Telyt-R 580mm at f/4.0 (the biggest caliber I could find)
    • Schneider 6.6" x 6.6" 85+PL Combo filter
    • Schneider 6.6" x 6.6" Coral Grad #1 Filter
    • EOS 50D with PL mount

    Now, you guys have to guess the results
    Attached Images
    Pawel Achtel B.Eng(Hons) M.Sc
    www.achtel.com
    Sharp to the Edge

    Land and Underwater Cinematography, Production and Equipment | DeepX - the world's only 5k underwater housing for RED Epic and Scarlet | 3Deep - the ultimate 3D underwater housing - available in US and Europe from Band Pro
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #13  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    541
    Pawel what were you testing? They are both schneider filters. Maybe you were testing with filter and without? Thanks,
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #14  
    Senior Member Pawel Achtel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Tasmania
    Posts
    3,603
    Yes, tested with and without filters in front of a long lens with a large aperture.
    Pawel Achtel B.Eng(Hons) M.Sc
    www.achtel.com
    Sharp to the Edge

    Land and Underwater Cinematography, Production and Equipment | DeepX - the world's only 5k underwater housing for RED Epic and Scarlet | 3Deep - the ultimate 3D underwater housing - available in US and Europe from Band Pro
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #15  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    3,506
    Thanks for posting the article Pawel. Useful info indeed.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #16  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    541
    Please tell us Pawel!

    I expect that there will be a loss in image quality, but that "noticeable" difference in the final shots/footage will depend on the size you are viewing at, and also the nature of the footage. With stills viewed on a large screen yes it will be quite obvious, but for a lot of moving footage viewed on the tv or web much less obvious. Eg if you shot a clip of a car speeding towards you in daylight with the ND on, versus not then the overall better image resulting from using the ND would outweigh the loss of sharpness, which would be less of a problem due to the moving subject. However if you are filming a stationary figure for a long distant shot, then yes.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #17  
    Senior Member Pawel Achtel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Tasmania
    Posts
    3,603
    Scientifically speaking the result of putting a (high quality) filter in front of a long (580mm), fast (f/4.0) high quality lens lens WFO is equivalent to smearing a layer of Vaseline over the front element, basically.

    In the next few days I'm going to do some tests at f/5.6 and f/8 but, I think, I will get the idea of using filters in front of long lenses out of my head.
    Pawel Achtel B.Eng(Hons) M.Sc
    www.achtel.com
    Sharp to the Edge

    Land and Underwater Cinematography, Production and Equipment | DeepX - the world's only 5k underwater housing for RED Epic and Scarlet | 3Deep - the ultimate 3D underwater housing - available in US and Europe from Band Pro
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #18  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    3,506
    Is this perhaps why some big long lenses have filter slots at the rear? (Other than front element size being too big)
    How does a rear mounted filter behave by comparison?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #19  
    Senior Member Pawel Achtel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Tasmania
    Posts
    3,603
    Quote Originally Posted by David Rasberry View Post
    Is this perhaps why some big long lenses have filter slots at the rear? (Other than front element size being to big)
    Right! And it has one. That's right: ONE!
    Pawel Achtel B.Eng(Hons) M.Sc
    www.achtel.com
    Sharp to the Edge

    Land and Underwater Cinematography, Production and Equipment | DeepX - the world's only 5k underwater housing for RED Epic and Scarlet | 3Deep - the ultimate 3D underwater housing - available in US and Europe from Band Pro
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #20  
    Senior Member Pawel Achtel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Tasmania
    Posts
    3,603
    Quote Originally Posted by David Rasberry View Post
    How does a rear mounted filter behave by comparison?
    You can't remove the rear filter. It is part of the optical design. The lens won't focus properly without it. You can insert different filters, including clear, which is present in both crops.
    Pawel Achtel B.Eng(Hons) M.Sc
    www.achtel.com
    Sharp to the Edge

    Land and Underwater Cinematography, Production and Equipment | DeepX - the world's only 5k underwater housing for RED Epic and Scarlet | 3Deep - the ultimate 3D underwater housing - available in US and Europe from Band Pro
    Reply With Quote  
     

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts