Click here to go to the first RED TEAM post in this thread.   Thread: Will CMOS work for me?

Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 21
  1. #1 Will CMOS work for me? 
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    18
    I mostly shoot fast action and green screen work. I've never shot with a CMOS camera before, and just started researching it. I'm now concerned that the fixed Scarlet (or any other CMOS camera) won't work for me at all.
    If I have footage of a backflip should I expect a slanted/distorted figure? If I stabilize this footage, will it truly become a wiggling image? Or has CMOS come a long way since these articles?

    http://www.dvxuser.com/jason/CMOS-CCD/
    http://www.ptgrey.com/support/kb/index.asp?a=4&q=115

    -I know we can't judge the Scarlet yet, but I am wondering if CMOS is not recommended for this imagery as a general rule.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2.   Click here to go to the next RED TEAM post in this thread.
  #2  
    You'll probably be fine because the shutter in Scarlet is so very fast you'll probably never see it's effects.

    Graeme
    www.red.com - 5k Digital Cinema Camera
    Science enables stories. Stories drive science
    FLUT™, Image Processing, Colour Science and Demosaic Algorithms, REDRAY 4K delivery
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3  
    Watch Gamer or Book of Eli. Tell me if in the action scene's you see any slanted figures: red CMOS in action.

    Also most commercials you see these days that have slow-mo.... a different CMOS in action.

    You seem to be combining attributes too. CMOS and rolling shutter are not synonymous. Additionally different sensors will have different read reset times.
    cheers

    J. Eric Camp
    600 DIT | NYC
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4  
    Senior Member PatC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    467
    Not all CMOS are created equal.
    www.twitter.com/pcecilian
    Local 600 DIT
    3D dude
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5  
    I can't really imagine the MX not working for anyone but I am a Red fanboy.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6  
    Senior Member Noah Kadner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    1,805
    Sort of like asking can I drive with unleaded gas. Get used to it- CMOS is in more camera models than it's not these days...

    Noah
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #7  
    With the much less noisy blue channel, decreased compression artifacts and faster reset time the Scarlet should be more than adequate for Greenscreen/Tracking. Certainly better than anything in its price range.
    Gavin Greenwalt || im.thatoneguy
    im.thatoneguy[at]gmail.com | Straightface Studios | VFX & Animation
    Canon Scarlet-X package available to rent in Seattle, WA
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #8  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Aliso Viejo, CA
    Posts
    262
    i've had the same thoughts, i shoot a majority of action sports. there is a skateboarding shot in the mx reel that looked great.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9.   This is the last RED TEAM post in this thread.   #9  
    So to summarize:

    short answer - Yes.
    long answer - most probably yes.

    Graeme
    www.red.com - 5k Digital Cinema Camera
    Science enables stories. Stories drive science
    FLUT™, Image Processing, Colour Science and Demosaic Algorithms, REDRAY 4K delivery
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #10  
    Junior Member george manzanilla's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    downey/los angeles
    Posts
    4
    Quote Originally Posted by Graeme Nattress View Post
    So to summarize:

    short answer - Yes.
    long answer - most probably yes.

    Graeme
    I'm new to the red product line, mostly because we have still been using 16mm and ccd based cameras, and quite frankly this is the only issue i was concerned about.

    When you say the "shutter speed in Scarlett is so very fast", does this mean that if i shoot an image with a 1/120 speed as opposed to a 1/500 shutter speed we may see a varying amount of rolling shutter artifacts? if one shoots at a slower shutter speed, will there be more of the jello artifiacts that i've seen plague footage shot on Canon 7ds etc.

    One of my concerns is stabilizing footage. I shoot a lot of handheld, i know there are filters to correct this type of cmos rolling shutter effect, but having to do that all the time may not be time efficient all the time. thanks for any knowledge you can share, much appreciated.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts