Thread: If you had to choose one lens for Traveling..

Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12
  1. #1 If you had to choose one lens for Traveling.. 
    Senior Member JosephArthur's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Off the Reservation (In California)
    Posts
    305
    If you had to choose one lens for traveling. Which would it be? Traveling along the Coast of California for one week backpacking with a Red (and maybe a steadicam/actioncam or not). (sorry one week is all i get from my wife).

    -Red
    -Mac Pro Laptop
    -4 CF Cards (and a ton of storage)
    -Red Charger
    -Dual/Swapable Battery Pack
    -Actioncam

    (MAYBE a DIT tent - the white one on the outside black on the inside).
    Joseph Arthur
    Off-Reservation ( feathers, not dots )
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2  
    Senior Member Sanjin Jukic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Vienna, Austria
    Posts
    8,710
    Budget option:

    Nikkor 17-35mm f/2.8 Manual focus zoom (that's what I have)


    Mid budget option:

    RED zoom 18-50mm T3 or even better the newer RED Pro 17-50mm zoom when is available


    Best options:

    Angenieux AX-16-42-OPT-DP T2.8 Zoom

    Angenieux AX-15-40 OPT T2.6 Zoom

    Cooke 15-40mm T2.0 CXX Zoom

    Fujinon 14.5–45mm T2.0
    "There is no point in having sharp images when you've fuzzy ideas."
    Jean-Luc Godard.

    Dynamic range is, after all, the measurement between well saturation (photosite blowout) and noise floor.
    Thom Hogan


    --------

    500px >>>
    Twitter >>>
    Facebook >>>
    Vimeo >>>
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3  
    Senior Member Charles Angus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    1,055
    For the wide end, Sanjin's recommendations would coincide pretty exactly with my own (although I've never used the Nikkor 17-35, so I can't say about that one). I would also add the Arri/Zeiss LWZ-1 to the lineup of wide PL zooms. It's small, light, and 15.5-45mm, T2.6.

    If you're looking at something slightly longer, there's the Angenieux 28-76 T/2.6. About the same weight as the other options, around 4-5 lbs.

    Then, if you're dead set on one lens, and quality is maybe a little less important than flexibility and portability, you could look into some of the stills superzoom options, like the Nikkor 18-200 f/2.5-5.6 or the Tamron 18-250 f/3.5-6.3. You can cover all your bases like that (excepting low light, I suppose). Not the sharpest lenses in the box, but hey - they cover an exceptional range. You would need a smart Nikon mount for these ones, pretty sure they don't have aperture rings.

    Not too sure what you're going to be shooting, but there's a few more options to get the brain ticking over.
    Last edited by Charles Angus; 04-04-2010 at 01:03 PM. Reason: removed redunant wording
    Charles Angus Taylor
    www.charlesangustaylor.com
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    3,506
    I support the view that you will want longer reach for nature shooting than a lens topping out at 70mm or less will give you. Gibby should weigh in on this one, but the wider range still zooms might be preferable for this if you must stick to one lens and shoot them as variable primes.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5  
    Senior Member D Fuller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Gorham, Maine
    Posts
    1,384
    With an Optitek Nikon mount, if you can stand 2 lenses, I'd suggest the 17-55 and the 70-200 Nikkor. That way, you get f/2.8 over all that range. If you don't need that much speed, Charles' suggestions of the 18-200 are spot on.
    David Fuller
    AirStream Pictures
    RED ONE #172MX
    EPIC-M #1053
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6  
    Senior Member JosephArthur's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Off the Reservation (In California)
    Posts
    305
    Quote Originally Posted by D Fuller View Post
    With an Optitek Nikon mount, if you can stand 2 lenses, I'd suggest the 17-55 and the 0-200 Nikkor. That way, you get f/2.8 over all that range. If you don't need that much speed, Charles' suggestions of the 18-200 are spot on.
    Thanks guys. I think the 18-200 would be good. Although the 18-50 as a default would be good.

    Originally I was thinking of a prime lens (specifically cause the lesser amount of moving parts). - but sacrificing versitility of shots.
    Joseph Arthur
    Off-Reservation ( feathers, not dots )
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #7  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Montreal
    Posts
    2,493
    Canon EFS 17-55 with Birger mount.
    Canon 85 1.2 for longer shots when you need them. Light kit, primo quality.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #8  
    Senior Member Tim Morten's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    685
    Quote Originally Posted by JosephArthur View Post
    Thanks guys. I think the 18-200 would be good. Although the 18-50 as a default would be good.

    Originally I was thinking of a prime lens (specifically cause the lesser amount of moving parts). - but sacrificing versitility of shots.
    Isn't the 18-200 a DX format lens? I don't think that will cover the 4K frame, but I haven't tried it.

    I'm an Optitek Nikon-mount fan myself... the 17-35 and the 70-200 are my goto zooms for both DSLR and Red. If you want to fill in the middle of the range, the 24-70 is also nice (but you said one, and now I'm up to 3).

    If you wanted a prime, that's a tough one... I'm not sure there's a right answer to the "If you could only have one focal length, what would it be?" question. Love my Zeiss ZF's on the Red though :).

    - Tim
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #9  
    Senior Member Tim Morten's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    685
    PS - If you've got room for an Actioncam or a DIT tent, I'm betting you might be able squeeze a case of primes in there. :)
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #10  
    Some good lens suggestions in this thread, but I'm confused as to why you're able to bring all the various kit you have listed, but can't squeeze in more than one lens? I'm not sure what you are trying to accomplish here.

    Do you have a mount preference? Suggestions are all over the place in here, in terms of lens mounts and formats.

    APS-C / Nikon DX lenses will cover 4K / 4.5K

    If lightweight and space are of concern, the Optitek Nikon mount is a real good choice. The 17-35 is an awesome lens. So are the newer 14-24, 24-70 and 70-200 zooms. In fact, for a travel kit, that would be my lens package of choice I think. Or the Optimo Rouge lenses in PL mount (16-42 and 30-80). Pssst, I know where there are some of them for sale...
    - Jeff Kilgroe
    - Applied Visual Technologies, LLC | RojoMojo
    - EPIC-M Package Available! Over 1TB SSD media, RPP's & more.


    List of all current RED software tools.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts